Page 103 - Encyclopedia Of World History
P. 103

crusades, the 453












            gravity or black holes or quantum uncertainty play roles  versality and openness to testing of modern scientific ac-
            similar to those of gods or other mythic creatures in tra-  counts of the past explain a final, crucial difference: their
            ditional creation stories. Finally, to an educated person  unwillingness to invoke anthropomorphic or spiritual
            today, modern origin stories have the same feeling of  explanations for origins. Such explanations are ruled out
            truth that traditional creation myths had for those  by modern science because they are too flexible to pro-
            brought up within them. Because of these many similar-  vide rigorous, refutable explanations, and therefore can-
            ities, it seems reasonable to suggest that modern “scien-  not be subjected to the strict rules of testing that under-
            tific” historiography, particularly in the form of world  pin modern science.
            history, can play many of the roles that creation myths  As this discussion suggests, world history is perhaps
            played in the past.                                 not so different from traditional creation myths. It, too,
              Yet there are also important differences. It is tempting  represents an attempt to tell the story of origins. But its
            to claim that modern scientific accounts of the past are  audience is global, and to generate the feeling of “truth-
            truer than those of traditional creation stories. Such  fulness” that all creation myths aspire to from a world-
            claims may be true, but they need to be made with care.  wide audience it must try to tell its origin stories without
            Even modern origin stories are anchored in time and  any taint of cultural bias, and with careful testing for rigor
            place, so in the future they will undoubtedly seem naive  and objectivity.
            and primitive in some respects, as traditional creation sto-
                                                                                                   David Christian
            ries do today. Furthermore, all creation stories have some-
            thing to teach outsiders insofar as they offer different ways  See also Universe, Origins of
            of thinking about reality. For example, many environ-
            mentalists have argued that modern societies need to
            recapture the sense of being a part of the natural world                Further Reading
            that is so pervasive in the creation stories of foraging soci-  Berry,T. (1988). The dream of the earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
                                                                Brockway, R. W. (1993). Myth from the Ice Age to Mickey Mouse.New
            eties. A clearer difference is that scientific origin stories  York: State University of New York Press.
            (like modern science in general) aim at universality.They  Christian, D. (2004). Maps of time: An introduction to big history. Berke-
                                                                  ley: University of California Press.
            expect to be believed not just by a single culture, but by
                                                                Griaule, M. (1975). Conversations with Ogotemmeli. Oxford, UK: Oxford
            all educated people on earth. To earn such universal  University Press.
            respect, they require a flexibility and openness that was  McNeill,W. H. (1985). Mythistory and other essays. Chicago: University
                                                                  of Chicago Press.
            lacking in many creation stories, for they have to appeal  O’Flaherty,W. D. (1981). The Rig Veda. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
            to intelligent people from many different cultural back-  Samuel, R., & Thompson, P. (Eds.). (1990). The myths we live by. Lon-
                                                                  don: Routledge.
            grounds, and they have to be able to incorporate new
                                                                Sproul, B. (1991). Primal myths: Creation myths around the world. San
            information.This requires a constant testing of hypothe-  Francisco: Harper Collins.
            ses and details to avoid the parochialism of most tra-  von Franz, M.-L. (1972). Creation myths. Dallas,TX: Spring Publications.
            ditional creation myths. Because modern scientific his-
            toriography (like science in general) appeals to a global
            audience, the tests to which it is subjected are numerous
            and thorough. (Unlike Ogotemmeli, we now know from               Crusades, The
            direct experience what the moon is made of and how
            large it is.) Modern creation stories can claim to be truer  he word “crusade,” derived from the Old Spanish
            than traditional creation myths insofar as the information Tcruzada, is best translated as  “an undertaking
            they contain has been more carefully tested, and as a  marked by a cross” and most commonly means a Chris-
            result they feel true to a much wider audience. The uni-  tian holy war.The original goal of the Crusades was the
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108