Page 268 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 268

religion and war 1569



                                                                 Prayer is not an old woman’s idle amusement. Properly
                                                                 understood and applied, it is the most potent instrument
                                                                    of action. • Mohandas Gandhi (1869–1948)



            scholar Julius Wellhausen writes,“It is remarkable that the  Christianity: Pacifism,
            heroes of Israel...show so little taste for war” (Lind  Crusades, and Just Wars
            1980, 34). The Jewish hero of the Exodus account,   The religious ambivalence toward warfare is perhaps
            Moses, does not, with a warrior might, destroy the  nowhere more graphically evidenced than in the history
            Egyptian army as it pursues the Jews; Yahweh drowns  of Christianity, as adherents of the religion have, at dif-
            the army with Moses as a bystander. Powerful Jewish  ferent times (and sometimes simultaneously), embraced
            kings like David and Solomon are as often chided for  pacifism, “holy” crusades, and “just” wars (that is, a war
            hubris as lauded for their might. While Jewish history  limited by strict moral principles).
            speaks of nationhood, land, and national destiny, its  For the first three centuries following the crucifixion of
            prophets more often speak of peace: “They shall beat  Christ (c. 30 CE), the Christian church was almost exclu-
            their swords into mattocks and their spears into    sively nonviolent. Founding its actions upon the teach-
            pruning-knives; nation shall not lift sword against  ings of Jesus to love the enemy and Jesus’ refusal to take
            nation nor ever again be trained for war” (Isaiah 2:4).  up arms in order to fight the Romans or even to prevent
              These two rival attitudes toward war emerge repeat-  his own arrest and execution, the early church opposed
            edly in Jewish history.The Maccabean revolt in the mid-  killing and warfare.Whereas the Roman gods were seen
            dle of the second century BCE pitted Jewish rebels  as advocates of the Roman people in their battles against
            against their Greek oppressors. When the Greeks, led  foreign foes, the influential Christian Bishop Clement of
            by Antiochus Epiphanes, attempted to stamp out Juda-  Alexandria (d. c. 215) writes in the second century,
            ism by forbidding all Jewish practices and desecrating  “Divinity now pervades all humankind equally. . . deify-
            the temple in Jerusalem, the Jews, led by the Mac-  ing humanity” (Pagels 1988, 39).
            cabaeus family, rebelled, eventually recapturing Jeru-  Christianity’s minority status within the powerful
            salem and reconsecrating the temple (an event       Roman Empire—until 312 CE, Christians constituted
            celebrated in the Jewish holiday Hanukkah).While the  no more than 10 percent of the population of the
            rebellion was doubtlessly violent in nature—some    Empire and were periodically subjected to savage per-
            scholars see it as an early instance of successful guerilla  secution at the hands of the state—provided an addi-
            warfare—a number of Jewish historians emphasize the  tional (and, some scholars say, more practical and
            fact that it was a group of nonviolent Jerusalem Jews  hence decisive) reason for the Christian rejection of war.
            who brought the ultimate victory. By peaceably with-  As Elaine Pagels writes: “Christians had discovered a
            drawing into the wilderness in response to the Greek  terrible secret: the powers behind the Roman magis-
            actions and taking their tax “dollars” with them, these  trates are not gods... but demons, active evil forces
            Jews, it is argued, forced the Greeks to relent and to  bent upon corrupting and destroying human beings”
            accept Jewish worship practices in Jerusalem. Jewish  (Pagels 1988, 39).The state meant death to Christians.
            scholars also point to the fact that the passage from  As such, Christian complicity in the state, and in the
            Zechariah that is traditionally read on the Sabbath of  institution of war, was largely rejected and pacifism was
            Hannukah declares: “Not by might and not by power   embraced. A minority of Christians—including mem-
            but by my spirit, saith the Lord of the Hosts” (Ferguson  bers of most monastic orders as well as denominations
            1978, 86).                                          such as the Mennonites—continue to this day to reject
              The ambivalence in Judaism concerning participation  all wars.
            in warfare and the use of violence continues to this day  In 312, Constantine (c. 280–337  CE) became the
            in the emotional and often divisive Jewish debate over  first Christian leader of the Roman Empire and quickly
            the proper response by the state of Israel to challenges  legalized the practice of Christianity. In 381, Emperor
            posed by Palestinians and their fight for statehood.  Theodosius (c. 346–395  CE) made Christianity the
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273