Page 41 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 41

1342 berkshire encyclopedia of world history












            domination through the imposition of unequal treaties in  a condition for nationalism. But ethnicity, language, and
            East Asia) was frequently justified by the allegation that  other markers of collectivity were not to become the nat-
            colonized societies did not possess the laws and institu-  ural basis of claims to sovereignty until the last decades
            tions of “civilized nation-states” and were thus not qual-  of the century. There may have been earlier, individual
            ified to participate in the system. Their resources and  cases of ethnicity or other collective markers being used
            labor were fair game for colonization and were mobilized  as rallying points to mobilize the people, but they were
            for capitalist competition. Thus the emerging system of  isolated and usually elitist; nationalism as a near-uni-
            nation-states was closely associated with imperialism  versal phenomenon emerged only in the later period and
            abroad.                                             became rapidly realized in the aftermath of World War I.
              Within the boundaries of the nation-state in Western
            Europe and North America, the nation became associ-  The Nation-State
            ated with the doctrine of rights for its citizens.The French  and Nationalism
            Revolution of 1789 protected and enforced human and  Several circumstances led to the emergence of mass
            individual rights as national rights.Article III of the Dec-  nationalism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth
            laration of the Rights of Man states,“The principle of all  centuries. Industrialization necessitated mass literacy and
            sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No body nor  interchangeable skills, which the philosopher Ernest Gell-
            individual may exercise any authority which does not  ner (1925–1995) argued required the state to produce a
            proceed directly from the nation (or the laws of that  culturally homogenous population congruent with state
            nation).” In the early stages, the majority of the popula-  boundaries.The political scientist Karl Deutsch (1912–
            tion, including women, minorities, and slaves within the  1992) noted the importance of modern mass media for
            nation, were not granted rights; their rights were won in  nation-building projects, and the political scientist Bene-
            the nineteenth and twentieth centuries through political  dict Anderson has emphasized the mass marketing of
            and military struggles. But the fact that such struggle for  print media in what he calls print capitalism, which
            rights became possible at all was due in large part to the  described the imagined community of the nation to the
            changed foundations of the sovereignty of the state.The  reading public. Nationalism was also linked to the poli-
            state no longer derived its sovereignty, particularly after  tics of mass mobilization that emerged with the increas-
            the antimonarchical American and French Revolutions,  ing democratization of European polities after 1880.
            from religious or dynastic claims, but increasingly from  Some of these conditions—such as the mobilization of
            the idea of the “people” of the nation.The notion of the  certain identities or a form of print capitalism—could be
            “nation-people” as the bearers of rights served as a spur  found earlier in imperial China and elsewhere. None-
            for self-determination and fueled the spread of national  theless, it was the simultaneous development of all or
            movements in the territories of the Napoleonic, Spanish,  most of these conditions within an evolving system of
            Hapsburg, Ottoman, and Czarist empires in the nine-  competition between states that shaped nationalism at
            teenth century.                                     the end of the nineteenth century as the ideology of the
              Even so, most of these movements were relatively elit-  nation-state.
            ist affairs, and nationalism as such did not appear until  The relationship between nationalism and competi-
            toward the end of the nineteenth century.According to the  tion between states was catalyzed by the challenge to
            historian Eric Hobsbawm, nationality was not viewed as  British global supremacy in the latter part of the nine-
            a birthright or an ascriptive status during much of the  teenth century. Nationalism became the ideological means
            nineteenth century. Patriotism in the eighteenth-century  among rising competitor states, such as Germany, Japan,
            revolutions in America and France was regarded as a  the United States, Russia, and Italy, to mobilize the pop-
            largely voluntary affair.To be sure, the territorial nation-  ulation and resources within the state’s territory in order
            state did produce the cultural homogenization that was  to gain competitive advantage globally. Political and cap-
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46