Page 80 - Encyclopedia Of World History Vol IV
P. 80

nubians 1381
                                                                                                           1381
                                                                                                nubians










              A treaty of mutual assistance between Belgium, France,  soil in the 1980s led to many anti-NATO demonstra-
            Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and the United King-   tions, notably in England.
            dom was signed in Brussels on 17 March 1948, with the  Many predicted that the fall of the Berlin Wall (9 No-
            Canadian prime minister expressing interest in joining  vember 1989) and the consequent removal of the Com-
            them on 28 April, and Senator Arthur H.Vandenberg of  munist menace would lead to the dissolution of NATO,
            the United States initiating talks in the Senate that re-  which had been negotiated and established against the
            sulted in the almost unanimous adoption on 11 June of  backdrop of the Berlin blockade and airlift (24 June
            a resolution calling for “the association of the United  1948–4 May 1949), but the organization seems to have
            States, by constitutional process, with such regional and  found a new lease of life, with action in Serbia in 1994
            other collective arrangements as are based on continuous  and the Middle East in 2004, and the accession in 1999
            and effective self-help and mutual aid, and as affect its  of the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland, followed in
            national security.” The road was clear for formal negoti-  2004 by that of the Baltic Republics (Estonia, Latvia,
            ations and the drafting of a treaty, which took place in  and Lithuania) and Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, and
            Washington from 6 July 1948 to 18 March 1949, when  Slovenia. The former anti-Communist, anti-Soviet
            the terms were made public, with the Brussels Treaty sig-  alliance may still be said to justify its mission “to restore
            natories, Canada, and the United States announcing  and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area” in
            that they had also asked Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Nor-  the face of new threats against the twenty-six sovereign
            way, and Portugal to join the proposed alliance and that  states that now compose it.
            they had accepted. (Spain only joined in 1982, after the
                                                                                                    Antoine Capet
            death of Francisco Franco.)
              These nations constituted the twelve founding mem-  See also Cold War; Containment
            bers, with Greece and Turkey joining in 1952. The con-
            troversial accession of the Federal Republic of Germany
            in 1955 led to the creation of the Warsaw Pact—the                      Further Reading
            Soviet Bloc’s version of the Atlantic alliance—and ex-  Duignan, P. (2000). NATO: Its past, present, and future. Stanford, CA:
                                                                  Hoover Institution Press.
            treme tension with Communist parties in Western Eur-  Heller, F. H., & Gillingham, J. R. (Vol.Eds.). (1992). NATO: The found-
            ope, which denounced the rearmament of “revanchist”   ing of the Atlantic alliance and the integration of Europe.The Franklin
                                                                  and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute series on diplomatic and economic his-
            (i.e., intent on starting another war avenging the defeat
                                                                  tory:Vol. 2. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
            of 1945) crypto-Fascists, as they saw the West German  North Atlantic Treaty Organization, official website. (2004). Retrieved
            governing elite. The 1960s saw another period of diffi-  April 20, 2004, from http://www.nato.int/
                                                                Park, W. (1986). Defending the West: A history of NATO. Boulder, CO:
            culty for NATO, over the question of the “American    Westview Press.
            nuclear umbrella” and who would decide on nuclear war.  Schmidt, G. (Ed.). (2001). A history of NATO: The first fifty years. Lon-
                                                                  don: Palgrave.
            Only two other members, the United Kingdom (1952)
            and France (1960), had a nuclear retaliation capacity—
            though it was in no way comparable to that of the two
            superpowers—and each chose a different course, with
            the British government opting for total integration of its                     Nubians
            nuclear deterrent (1962) while France, under General de
            Gaulle and his successors, decided that continued mem-  or over a thousand years, from the fourth century to
            bership in NATO did not preclude independent nuclear Fthe fourteenth century CE, the medieval Nubian king-
            strikes (1966). After the period of detente in the 1970s,  doms and their peoples dominated a wide span of Africa,
            the installation of American cruise missiles on European  stretching 1,200 kilometers from the plains of the Blue
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85