Page 187 - Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies
P. 187

Bar-Cohen : Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies DK3163_c005 Final Proof page 173 6.9.2005 12:11pm




                    Genetic Algorithms in Optimization Models                                   173

                    Table 5.6 Results for Hybrid Genetic Algorithms
                    Distance          Gender       *       Average     Maximum       Time per run (sec)
                    Steepest descent
                    K ¼ 1               No         86        1452         1264             0.57
                    K ¼ 2               No        125        1471         1254             0.62
                    K ¼ 3               No        114        1469         1214             0.64
                    K ¼ 4               No         79        1458         1170             0.65
                    K ¼ 5               No         50        1449         1180             0.66
                    K ¼ 1               Yes        78        1452         1236             0.57
                    K ¼ 2               Yes       115        1469         1334             0.62
                    K ¼ 3               Yes        74        1460         1262             0.65
                    K ¼ 4               Yes        61        1448         1164             0.66
                    K ¼ 5               Yes        56        1440         1120             0.67
                    10 Levels
                    K ¼ 1               No        430        1510         1420            25.54
                    K ¼ 2               No        584        1524         1432            27.15
                    K ¼ 3               No        631        1528         1428            28.29
                    K ¼ 4               No        607        1527         1400            28.82
                    K ¼ 5               No        626        1528         1428            29.32
                    K ¼ 1               Yes       448        1511         1412            25.51
                    K ¼ 2               Yes       612        1525         1422            27.14
                    K ¼ 3               Yes       591        1525         1398            28.17
                    K ¼ 4               Yes       594        1526         1420            28.91
                    K ¼ 5               Yes       568        1524         1402            29.36
                    25 Levels
                    K ¼ 1               No        538        1518         1426            58.46
                    K ¼ 2               No        616        1526         1438            62.01
                    K ¼ 3               No        691        1532         1448            64.06
                    K ¼ 4               No        688        1532         1450            65.49
                    K ¼ 5               No        664        1531         1420            66.56
                    K ¼ 1               Yes       516        1517         1402            58.58
                    K ¼ 2               Yes       632        1527         1448            61.86
                    K ¼ 3               Yes       660        1530         1420            64.27
                    K ¼ 4               Yes       673        1531         1428            65.60
                    K ¼ 5               Yes       639        1529         1384            66.46
                    *Number of times out of 1000 that the best known solution of  1550 was obtained.



                    definition keeps evolving with changing environmental conditions and across species. For example,
                    the male bird of paradise in New Guinea is the fittest when his feathers and tail are very colorful and
                    attractive to the female bird of paradise. The same colorful and beautiful male would not be the
                    fittest in a different environment (off the island), one that is predator rich. Similarly, the peppered
                    moth, in England, during the Industrial Revolution would not have survived without a color
                    adaptation. In urban areas, the fittest was the darker peppered moth that adapted to the new gray,
                    ash-covered trees on which it rests. By blending into the tree, it protected itself from predators,
                    while at the same time, in rural areas, the peppered moth continued to thrive and survive on lichen-
                    covered tree branches. Unlike nature, in genetic algorithms the definition of the ‘‘fittest’’ is stable.
                    The more stable definition of ‘‘fittest’’ in genetic algorithms, in turn, allows for the ultimate
                    achievement of an ‘‘ideal’’ population, a situation not paralleled in nature.
                      In nature, species have to cope with invasion of other species and competition for resources.
                    Species diversity is rampant as genetic diversity is instrumental to adaptation. The survival of the
                    fittest individual leads to survival of the species. In genetic algorithms, by comparison, there is one
                    species only. Occasionally generating offspring who are ‘‘fitter’’ than existing members in order to
                    ‘‘enrich’’ the population ‘‘gene pool’’ incorporates invasion in genetic algorithms. PGA allow
                    population movements, but those are of the same species. In compounded genetic algorithms,
                    there is no population movement between the isolated populations.
                      Offspring mutation is another natural selection tenet incorporated in genetic algorithms. Muta-
                    tions occur quite frequently in nature. Most mutations are not beneficial to the species, while some,
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192