Page 116 - Biorefinery 2030 Future Prospects for the Bioeconomy (2015)
P. 116

84         4  Prospects for the Bazancourt-Pomacle Biorefinery Between Now and 2030


            – Training and employment of researchers, project leaders, managers, laboratory
              and installation technicians, ready to enter the job market or set up their
              own firm.
            – Creation of economic value through research and development and formulas
              validated on pilot or demonstration sites in different forms (sales or licencing of
              patents, company creation, contributions in kind to industrial projects etc.).

              The model targeted by the CEBB is more ambitious than that encountered in
            many universities, which consists in “juxtaposing” under the same umbrella
            organisation (Centre of Excellence in the interdisciplinary field of X) laboratories
            whose centre of gravity remains in the original laboratory. The CEBB will need to
            link a scientific community with an industrial site in such a way that genuine
            synergies occur. It will have three main challenges to take up:

            – develop and demonstrate the extra added value created by multidisciplinary,
              non-compartmentalised approaches.
            – help teams with different legal statuses coexist and prosper.
            – develop an effective governance structure.



            1.1    Multidisciplinarity

            Creating multidisciplinarity consists in encouraging teams and individuals who
            usually work in silos or closed circuits to understand each other and work together.
            How can one create a successful mosaic made up of biotechnologies, chemistry,
            biochemistry, physics, process engineering, economics, management sciences and
            other social sciences?
              Our interviews at Bazancourt-Pomacle show that the category “engineer” is by
            no means homogenous, unlike what outsiders might expect: engineers trained in
            more “determinist” disciplines find it difficult to assimilate the terms of reference of
            engineers trained in less determinist disciplines such as white biotechnologies.
            Different cultures exist, that are more or less penetrable or familiar with each
            other, which can sometimes explain a lack of understanding about industrial
            challenges or choices. 2
              To succeed in its mission, the CEBB must therefore create exchange
            mechanisms and initiate scientific, technological and economic “promiscuity” 3
            between its members, despite their differences in terms of discipline and the status
            of personnel.


            2
             This remark can be partly “theorised,” since other research into power trains and alternative fuels
            has shown that physical engineers in an electricity firm are more liable to understand and become
            involved in the field of electric vehicles or fuel cells, whilst chemical engineers in oil firms feel
            closer to the field of bio-fuels (Source: Stevens and Schieb 2013).
            3
             “Promiscuity”: this noun is used in its etymological sense, from promiscuous in Latin, in other
            words common, shared, general, indiscriminate (Source: OED).
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121