Page 163 - Biosystems Engineering
P. 163

142    Cha pte r  F o u r

               4.3.2  Methods Used to Build Models for
                       Predicting Soil Temperature

               Physical Methods
               Because most models for predicting soil temperature are based on solv-
               ing the transient heat-conduction equation, we need to use analytical
               or numerical calculation methods with implicit or explicit solutions.
                   Transient analytical methods have been widely implemented
               using the Fourier series. Horton and Wierenga (1983) estimated heat
               flows in homogeneous soils by using the Fourier series, and although
               the results were similar to the results obtained from integration
               methods, they obtained results that were not strictly applicable to
               nonuniform soils. Differences between the thermal behavior of uni-
               form soils and nonuniform soils were also spotted by Wiltshire
               (1983), who calculated periodic heat flow by harmonic analysis. The
               harmonic analysis method was used by Cenis (1989), Alvarez et al.
               (1996), and Shao et al. (1998) and was combined with dynamic filter-
               ing and spectral analysis by Persaud and Chang (1983) and Matthias
               and Warrick (1987), who developed soil temperature models that
               were successfully validated. With appropriate simplifications, ana-
               lytical treatment allowed for predicting temperature fields of the
               fluid in the pipe and the soil in the proximity of the buried pipe of
               earth-to-air heat exchangers installed at different depths, and used
               for building cooling/heating (Cucumo et al. 2008).
                   Despite the good results of analytical methods, many research-
               ers have used numerical methods to analyze heat flow in soils
               (Hanks et al. 1971). The reason for this is that using analytical meth-
               ods in the integration of the heat-transfer equation requires assum-
               ing some simplifications, whereas using numerical methods allows
               for introducing thermal properties that are dependent on particular
               soil and water conditions, and of more complex boundary condi-
               tions (Porta et al. 1999).
                   Horton (1989) developed a two-dimensional numerical model to
               predict heat and water flow in soils with row crops. Papadakis et al.
               (1989) estimated soil surface temperature in greenhouses using
               numerical methods, whereas Novak (1991) suggested the use of
               numerical models to improve the accuracy of temperature prediction
               on the soil surface after having used analytical methods to model soil
               surface temperature. Later, Novak (1993) proposed an analytical
               model with two-dimensional solutions for temperature and heat flows
               in soils with bare strips alternating with strips covered with plastic or
               other materials and used radiation surface boundary conditions.
                   Physically based equations solved by analytical methods combined
               with remote-sensing techniques permitted a more theoretically rigor-
               ous estimation of area–average soil heat flux. Muffay and Verhoef
               (2007) used a standard physical equation to estimate the soil heat flux
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168