Page 129 - Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair
P. 129

104            SECTION 1                                                  ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES



                            The sudden reduction in the load carrying capacity of a member may occur due to post
                        buckling and subsequent inelastic cyclic member behavior.
                            If a truss with redundant members is subjected toa slight quasi-static overload such that the
                        failure is initiated by buckling of a member, post buckling and subsequent cycles of inelastic
                        force-deformation behavior of truss members may create adverse member force redistribution
                        that leads tocomplete collapse of the structure.

                        3.12.2  Suggested Preventive Action against Failure from Bomb Blast
                        1. Load combinations in AASHTO code should be clearly defined, and a suitable method of

                            analysis should be adopted.
                        2. Attention should be paid to multi-hazard design procedures to maintain neededsafety
                            levels.
                        3. Life cycle costs should be included for making appropriate retrofi t decisions.
                        4. Improving security at bridges by surveillance cameras, preventing parking in the vicinity of
                            bridges, installing fire controlling devices near bridge parapets, and more vigilant policing

                            are required.
                        3.13  FIRE DAMAGE TO SUPERSTRUCTURES AND PREVENTIVE ACTION
                        3.13.1 Vehicular Accidents
                            Overturning of trucks due to slippery decks may cause spraying of the deck with gasoline
                        and fire. Also, vehicular accidents can be the cause of fi re.

                            Table 3.10 shows historic details of bridge failures due to fi re.
                        3.13.2  Repairing the Fire Damaged Notre Dame Bridge

                            OnApril 12, 2003 a fireignited underneath an important bridge in the City of Manchester,

                        New Hampshire. Although the fire was intentionally set and causedmajor interruptions to traf-


                        fic, telephone lines and some city firedepartment communications, there is no evidence that this
                        was anact of terrorism. Althoughthere are emergency plans in place and precautions to prevent
                        additional threats, disasters (natural and man-made) arestill going to occur.
         Table 3.10  Bridge failures due to fi re (accidental spill of oil or vandalism).
         U.S. Bridges             Location           Year     Details of Failure

         Two U-section bridges    South of Le Mars, Iowa  1941  Fire due to collision of two vehicles
         (Floyd River)

         Notre Dame Bridge        Manchester,        2003     Arson
                                  New Hampshire
         I-95 bridge              Northeast of Philadelphia,  2004  Fire started due to accidental burning of used tires
                                  Pennsylvania                dumped under the bridge piers
         Wooden bridge spanning Rio   Pico Rivera, California  2005  Fire began in combustibles beneath the bridge and spread
         Hondo fl ood control channel                          to wooden infrastructure—Arson
         British Bridges

         Tubular Britannia Bridge  Menai Straits, Whales  1970  Timber roof impregnated with tar paints helped fi re, steel
                                                              box girder superstructure defl ections of up to 0.75 m
         Flyover over A406, Staples Corner London, England  1992  IRA bomb exploded underneath, causing serious damage
                                                              to roads and nearby buildings—vandalism
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134