Page 144 - Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair
P. 144

CHAPTER 3                           BRIDGE FAILURE STUDIES AND SAFETY ENGINEERING           119



         7.  Future design code specifi cations or construction procedures need to consider reasons for
            failures as guidelines in developing a comprehensive approach. When implemented, such
            measures are likely to minimize the frequency of failures.
            •   Durability requirements need to be addressed on a scientifi c basis.
            •   AASHTO code provisions and other relevant codes need to be followed.
            •   The engineer needs to refresh his knowledge of dynamic analysis, hydraulics, and materials
              science through continuing education. These disciplines would help to combat challenges
              of an early failure.
         8.  Fatigue, scour, and seismic analysis should be carried out in detail. Design criteria must
            include specialized subjects such as fragility analysis and ship collision analysis. All designs
            should be refined to include fracture mechanics principles for fracture of steel, concrete, and

            composites. Thermal analysis and bearing design to prevent malfunction are necessary.
         9.  Although the past studies in general were able to identify immediate causes of failures, their
            diagnosis was restricted to case studies only. Most of the older bridges which failed did not
            have as-built drawings to evaluate their strengths in bending and shear.
        10. Results of failure studies are not easy to analyze due to a large number of variables contribut-
            ing to failure. Comparisons made between failure types revealed similar trends of failures
            occurring during the bridge’s service life. Also, lack of maintenance and human-induced
            external events occurred frequently.
        11. Forensic engineering investigations of failures are partly based on technical reasons and to
            some extent they narrow down the blame either the designer or the contractor. However,
            there may be reasons other than individual responsibility.
        12. Design criteria used did not include scour of foundations or earthquakes. Design live loads
            were lighter than the modern vehicles, resulting in less fatigue.
        13. Mandatory insurance of bridges may induce highway agencies to take a greater interest in
            research and development of safety procedures (Figures 3.17 to 3.19).

        3.20.2  Regular Inspection of Transportation Facilities
            Inspection is critical to public safety. A problem of growing damages to bridges identifi ed
        over time has resulted in increasing the minimum designstress for H-20 loading.
        1. Older bridges were not designed tomeet the new criterion.
        2. More and heavier trucks are usingour roads every day, increasing the rates of deterioration
            of bridges and pavements.






















        Figure 3.17  A truck falls in a river due to a bridge failure in 2004.
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149