Page 314 - Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair
P. 314

CHAPTER 7                         BRIDGE WIDENING AND DECK REPLACEMENT STRATEGY             289



        Table 7.3  Useful service life for highway structures
                                 Rehabilitation/      Useful Service Life*
        No.    Location of Member  Protective Measures  (Years)        Remarks
        1A     Existing culverts  Repairs and/or rehabilitation 25     Can be extended to
                                                                       50 years with maintenance


        1B     Culverts with extension Rehabilitation  75              Can be extended to
                                                                       100 years with maintenance

        1C     New culvert       Replacement          100              Can be extended to
                                                                       9 100 years with maintenance
        2A     Existing framed   Repairs and/or rehabilitation 50      Maintenance required
               sign structures
        2B     New framed        Replacement          75               Maintenance required
               sign structures
        3A     Existing cantilever   Repairs and/or rehabilitation 25  Fatigue prone—
               sign structures                                         Maintenance required
        3B     New cantilever    Replacement          50               Fatigue prone—
               sign structures                                         Maintenance required
        4A     Ground-mounted    Replacement          50               Maintenance required
               sound barriers



        4B     Structure-mounted   Replacement        75               Maintenance required
               sound barriers


        * Varies from project to project and depending on ADT and no extreme conditions of earthquake or fl ood.




            •   It may be necessary to take disruption of traffic and user costs into account on replace-
              ment projects since there would be a change that would impact the traveling public on a
              permanent basis.

            •  Detouring traffic in highly urbanized areas may not be feasible from a capacity point of
              view.
         2.  REP/REH percentage is between 120 and 150 percent.
            In this range, rehabilitation or replacement may be the preliminary choice. Other factors
            must be examined to establish the appropriate type of work.
        3. REP/REH percentage 9 150 percent.
            The preliminary choice in this case is rehabilitation. Other factors, such as bridge type, must
            be examined to ensure compatibility with rehabilitation.

        7.3.7 Cost-Benefi t Analysis
            Due to the huge investment involved, reconstruction and maintenance of bridges need to be
        considered as running and operating a modern industry. Planning and utilization of funds are
        sensitive but important issues. If repairs are not made in time, progressive retrofi t or rehabilita-
        tion costs will be incurred. Providing repair costs by a highway agency is mandatory, however,
        investing in a new bridge or highway is optional.
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319