Page 17 - Caldera Volcanism Analysis, Modelling and Response
P. 17

xvi                                                                Preface


          consequence, not the cause of the collapse. At Kilauea Volcano in Hawaii, the
          concept of caldera formation by post-eruptive collapse was also recognised by
          Dutton (1884).
             At the beginning of the 20th century, some examples of eroded calderas
          (cauldrons) were first interpreted as subsided blocks associated with igneous activity,
          e.g. Glen Coe in Scotland (Clough et al., 1909) and the eroded calderas in the
          Tertiary San Juan volcanic field, Colorado (Burbank, 1933). Subsequent
          investigations recognised a collapse origin for Crater Lake, Oregon (Diller and
          Patton, 1902), and identified the Toba caldera in Indonesia and the post-collapse
          resurgent uplift of its floor (Van Bemmelen, 1929). A few years later, large
          Pleistocene calderas associated with voluminous explosive volcanism were
          recognised in southwestern Japan (Matumoto, 1943).
             In 1941, Williams presented an insightful analysis of calderas and their origin.
          He assumed the reverse relation as suggested by Fouque ´ (1879), that most large
          calderas form by collapse after the eruption of magma during pyroclastic volcanism.
          In the 60s and 70s, several studies (Smith, 1960, 1979; Smith and Bailey, 1968)
          provided a conceptual framework for stratigraphic studies of ash flow sheets, a
          model of collapse resurgence within ash flow calderas and a petrologic framework
          for ash flow magmatism. Also important were the studies of pyroclastic deposits
          (e.g. Sparks and Walker, 1977; Walker, 1980; Wilson and Walker, 1982) that
          showed the way for correlating the physical properties of pyroclastic deposits with
          their emplacement mechanism.
             The tremendous progress made since the 1960s in the related fields of
          pyroclastic flow analysis, caldera geology and caldera dynamics are difficult to
          summarise. However, after these pioneering works, collapse calderas have been the
          subject of studies of diverse disciplines. In fact, during the last decades, analogue
          modelling has become a useful tool in the study of caldera-collapse processes. The
          first experiments were performed by Ramberg (1967, 1981), who carried out
          centrifuge experiments using putty (the magma chamber analogue) under a roof of
          clay (the host rock analogue). These experiments and posterior works (e.g. Komuro
          et al., 1984; Komuro, 1987; Martı ´ et al., 1994; Roche et al., 2000; Roche and
          Druitt, 2001) focused on understanding caldera-collapse mechanisms and resulting
          caldera structures. The use of analogue models for caldera studies is currently
          increasing, and new questions such as the influence of regional tectonics and the
          effect of pre-existing topography (volcanic edifice) on the formation of collapse
          calderas are arising (Acocella et al., 2002, 2004).
             Simultaneously, theoretical models based on the application of thermodynamics
          and solid and fluid mechanics have progressively become an indispensable tool
          for the investigation of caldera-forming processes. These theoretical studies are
          oriented towards different aspects of the collapse caldera formation, mainly the
          behaviour of magma (Druitt and Sparks, 1984; Bower and Woods, 1997; Martı ´
          et al., 2000; Roche and Druitt, 2001) or the behaviour of host rocks (Komuro
          et al., 1984; Gudmundsson et al., 1997; Gudmundsson, 1998; Folch and Martı ´,
          2004).The geophysical disciplines have also significantly contributed to our
          understanding of calderas in recent years: first, by providing unprecedented insights
          into their subsurface structure using in particular seismic signals to construct
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22