Page 161 - Carbon Capitalism and Communication Confronting Climate Crisis
P. 161

152  B. BREVINI AND T. WORONOV

            George Brandis, Attorney-General for Australia, during a Question Period
            in the Senate, the mine would also help tackling climate change issues:

              I am sure it has not escaped your notice that some forms of coal are cleaner
              than others and the coal that will be mined from the Carmichael mine by
              Adani is some of the cleanest coal in the world. So the consequence of the
              development of the Carmichael mine by Adani, the export of that relatively
              clean coal to India and its use in a new generation of Indian electricity
              generation to replace the pollutant biomass upon which those people rely at
              the moment will be to produce a much cleaner energy outcome (Senator
              Brandis questioned at Senate, Hansard 2015).

            Within this logic, the government argues that opening up the Southern
            Hemisphere’s largest coalmine “will cut carbon pollution” (Hansard
            2015).


               UNWANTED FACTS AS DEBATABLE,DOUBTFUL OR POLITICAL
            A second component of ‘truthiness’ is the practice of deliberately presenting
            empirical facts as debatable, uncertain or political. This is accomplished in
            several different ways. One prominent tactic is the use of oxymorons to
            create contradictory messages. Kirsch and Benson (2010) derive their
            analysis of corporate oxymorons from George Orwell, whose book 1984
            described how the state sought to make alternative thought impossible
            through the tactical appropriation and juxtaposition of key terms, rather
            than outright censorship. As they point out, in Orwell’s use, some of these
            terms were euphemisms that meant almost the exact opposite of what they
            appeared to mean. Today, they note, corporations also rely on new oxy-
            morons that rely on a figure/ground reversal that conceal the contradic-
            tions of capitalism (in this case the harms of the mine).
              In the case of the Carmichael mine, proponents created new terms to
            conceal the harmful effects of the mine. One is the same tactic described by
            Kirsch (2010), the construction of a concept of ‘sustainable mining.’ As
            Kirsch describes, mining corporations globally have redefined the term
            ‘sustainable’ away from its original meaning, linked to environmentally
            sustainable projects, to now mean mining projects that provide employ-
            ment (ibid.). In Australia, mine proponents were quick to use this redefi-
            nition of ‘sustainability.’ On 15 March 2016, Anthony Lynham,
            Queensland Minister for Development and Natural Resources, declared:
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166