Page 108 - Carbonate Facies in Geologic History
P. 108

Porosity and Permeability                                          95

               uncommon.  The  reader  is  referred  to  several  studies  on  this  subject  (Murray,
               1960; Thomas,  1962; Harbaugh in  Chilingar et aI.,  1967;  Choquette and  Pray,
               1970, Fig.I11-5  of this volume). Several types  of porosity can be recognized and
               classified genetically:
               1.  Secondary solution along fractures due presumably to meteoric water.
               2.  Secondary solution in the form of vugs or cavities presumably due to meteoric
                 water.
               3.  Primary vugs and cavities in reefframework.
               4.  Primary interparticle porosity in sands and gravels  preserved from  cementa-
                 tion. Primary interparticle porosity in pelagic microfossil silts (chalky).
               5.  Chalky (very fine porosity) caused by lack of early cementation and by replace-
                 ment of original lime mud fabric by blocky calcite crystals. Preservation of up
                 to 30% porosity, very little permeability.
               6.  Sucrose dolomite porosity, which forms during early dolomitization of nonli-
                 thified calcareous mud. This process preserves original porosity, using up car-
                 bonate ion as Mg replaces pure Ca in the original mud and growing dolomite
                 crystals to form a noncompactible framework.
                  Fig. III-5  is  recommended as  a  key for  describing  porosity  in  the  following
               order: genetic modifier plus size plus type plus percentage of bulk volume of rock.
               E.g., secondary eogenetic intercrystalline and moldic dolomitization porosity-
               10% (Choquette and Pray, 1970).



































             <III Fig. III -5. Geologic classification of pores and pore systems in carbonate rocks. From Cho-
               quette and Pray (1970, Fig. 2), with permission of American Association of Petroleum Geolo-
               gists
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113