Page 177 - Carbonate Facies in Geologic History
P. 177

164                               The Lower Carboniferous Waulsortian Facies

               gentle  collapse  of mud  and  decay  in  organisms  by  causing  a  rigid  cemented
               framework.  No modern analog  to  such  cementation  in  calcite  muds  has  been
               found.  Indeed, marine cementation seen to date either requires  an inordinately
               long time (deep sea crusts) or is  observed in  areas  where  rapidly  moving water
               permeates host rock (e.g., framebuilt reefs or shallow-shelflime sands). How could
               moving water in sufficient  quantity have cemented cavities in  mud without re-
               moving the host sediment? The coarse drusy calcite filling of Permo-Triassic mud
               accumulations in  the Dolomites and Permian  Reef  Complex  present  the  same
               problem (Chapter VIII). Is the cementation early marine or late vadose?
                  The most logical explanation for  stromatactoids appears to be  the filling  of
               cavities formed in mud through settling of plates and fronds, and through slump-
               ing or brecciation of the mud mass. But the time of origin of the calcite in fill  and
               its diagenetic environment (in marine or connate water) presents a difficult prob-
               lem.


               Bryozoan Fronds and Crinoid Ossicles in Mounds


               Not only regional stratigraphy and petrography, but also paleontology bears on
               the  origin  of the  peculiar  Waulsortian  facies.  After  thin  section  studies  were
               undertaken by  several  researchers in the  1950's,  it  was  realized  that  fenestrate
               bryozoans  were  an  important faunal  element  in  the  mud  mounds  as  well  as
               scattered echinoderm plates. Typically these calcified bryozoan fronds, along with
               the ubiquitous  stalked crinoids,  show adaptation for  food  gathering in  moder-
               ately moving currents below  active wave  base.  The common association  of the
               fenestrates  and crinoids leads to the assumption that perhaps the long stems  of
               the echinoderms were rooted in mud and that the bryozoan fronds were growing
               attached to them as  prevention against smothering in the soft muddy substrate.
               Estimates of bryozoan content range from 4 to 20% of rock volume. Pray (1958)
               notes that in the micrite of the mound cores bryozoans are more abundant than
               crinoids. Probably the light and lacy fronds easily floated  in  to collect with  the
               lime mud. The bryozoan fronds possibly trapped lime mud and stabilized it  on
               the steep slopes.


               Flanking Encrinites (Plate XXI)

               Large mounds in New  Mexico and Montana are commonly flanked  by  steeply
               dipping  beds  of coarse  encrinite  made  of disarticulated  stems,  arm,  and  calyx
               plates. Similar beds occur in Ireland and Britain but are not so common as in the
               North American mounds.  Battered fenestrate  bryozoan remains  also  are abun-
               dant with the crinoidal fragments.  These flank  beds  are practically free  of lime
               mud, almost purely bioclastic and petrographically monotonous.  Only in a few
               places are lithoclasts important components of flanking  beds despite the size  of
               the mounds and the steepness of their slopes. Apparently the mounds were diffi-
               cult to erode or they were located below  active wave  base.  Probably Paleozoic
               crinoid segments like all echinoderm plates were so thoroughly impregnated with
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182