Page 289 - Carbonate Facies in Geologic History
P. 289

276                        Reef Trends and Basin Deposits in Late Jurassic Facies

               reef barrier, and separated from each other by reef knolls. These Solnhofen depos-
               its  were quarried in earlier times  for  lithographic  stone  and  more  recently  for
               flagstones. The depositional basins of these  strata actually stretch all  along  the
               reef girdle, lying behind its front and being generally of Kimmeridgian-Tithonian
               Jurassic age. They are known from Montsech in the Pyrenees, Cerin in the French
               Jura, Nusplingen in Schwabia, and most importantly, in the valley of the AltmUhl
               River, in the Franconian village of Solnhofen and from Eichstatt. Here the some-
               what irregular distribution of the basins has been illustrated by Freyberg in 1968
               (Fig.IX-7). The swales lie roughly between north-south trending reef knolls  and
               platforms. The platy basinal limestones are not very fossiliferous  but what fauna
               is present is strikingly preserved with many soft parts moulded as delicate impres-
               sions,  for  example insect  wings  and  bird feathers.  The extensive  collections  in
               museums  in  Eichstatt,  Munich,  Frankfurt,  Stuttgart,  and  Berlin  result  from
               200 years of painstaking hand quarry operations.
                  Many persons have studied the fossil collections and recently sedimentological
               studies  have  added  greatly  to  our  understanding  of  these  fascinating  strata.
               Earlier some paleontologists considered the Solnhofen limestones to be tidal flat
               deposits but now the consensus favors  an origin in quiet, somewhat deep local
               basins.  Controversy  also  continues  over  the  origin  of  the  extraordinarily  fine
               micrite sediment. The description  of the deposits  and  their  fossils  given  below
               follows  modern sedimentological interpretations in reviews  of the  problems  by
               Barthel (1970), Van Straaten (1971), and De Buisonje (1972).




               Lithology

                  1.  Thelimestone is very fine-grained micrite, with calcite mosaic of 3-4 microns.
               Electron scanning microscope studies have recently shown that the micrite con-
               tains abundant coccolith plates (FlUgel and Franz, 1967).
                  2.  It occurs in thin planar beds from a few mm to 30 cm thick.
                  3.  The layers of pure micritic limestone (Flinze) are locally interbedded with
               marls (Faule).
                  4.  The limestone are about 97-98%  CaC0 3 ,  the 2%  residue,  being  Fe and
               silica. The interbedded marls are actually 85-91 % CaC0 3  and contain clay min-
               erals.
                  5.  The rhythmic bedding resembles that of certain deep-water and slope lime-
               stones found  in  basins  and geosynclines.  Perhaps the  limestone  beds  represent
               kinds of turbidity or density  current deposits,  rapidly deposited following  peri-
               odic storms (Plate XXVII).
                  6.  Marl  layers  seem  more  common  over  older  high  areas;  limestone  beds
               thicken into the intervening basins.
                  7.  Individual  limestone  beds  are  traceable  from  quarry  to  quarry  over  as
               much as 8km.
                  8.  The strata lack the sedimentary structures found  in  recent  tidal flats;  no
               algal stromatolites, mud cracks, tidal channel or washout deposits, fenestral fab-
               ric,  or flat  pebble  conglomerates  occur.  Ripple  mark is  extremely  uncommon.
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294