Page 330 - Carbonate Facies in Geologic History
P. 330

The Stratigraphy of Dolomite                                      317

                  5.  In several instances where carbonate buildups on shelf margins are well-dolomitized,
               there is little or no dolomitization of forereef talus  blocks derived from the bordering reef or
               forereef.  This clearly indicates dolomitization at a somewhat later period than reef growth.
               Examples  are:  the  Canning  basin  foreslope  exotic  boulders  of  Devonian  age,  northwest
               Australia; the Miette-Ancient Wall  debris  flows  (Late  Devonian)  in  the  Canadian Rockies
               (Chapter IV); the Triassic Cipit  blocks  in  the  Dolomites  and  the lower  talus  blocks  of the
               Permian  Reef Complex  (Chapter VIII).  Adams  and  Rhodes  (1960)  proposed  a  theory  of
               penecontemporaneous reflux  dolomitization for  Guadalupian strata; it  is  also possible that
               dolomitization of the  shelves  surrounding the Delaware basin  occurred toward  the end  of
               Permian time when the overlying Salado evaporites were extensively deposited  beyond  the
               confines of the basin. Dolomitization also affected the coarse and once permeable talus in the
               middle foreslope of the shelf margin rather than the micritic (less  permeable?) sponge-algal
               facies of the upper slope.
                  A related example is found in the Ordovician exotic boulders in the Marathon fold belt of
               West Texas (Wilson, 1954; McBride, 1969; Young, 1970). The blocks derived from the Lower
               Ordovician  Ellenburger  group  are  practically  all  limestone  whereas  the  environmentally
               equivalent  shelf  facies  is  highly  dolomitized.  The  best  interpretation  is  that  Ellenburger
               dolomitization occurred after the boulders were emplaced (i.e., in late Canadian and Middle
               Ordovician time during the formation  of the widespread North American pre-Simpson un-
               conformity).
                  6.  A consideration of dolomitization during geologic time also permits the inference that
               "somewhat later" diagenetic processes  are  at work  to cause  it.  It is  well  known (Chilingar
               1956) that  Paleozoic and  Precambrian  carbonates are  more dolomitized  than  those  of the
               Mesozoic and later time and that the geologic record contains much more dolomite than can
               be accounted for when compared with what is forming today. Inasmuch as there is not much
               evidence that Paleozoic tidal flats were more extensive over the world than in  the Mesozoic,
               one  may  assume  that  Paleozoic  limestones  have  simply  had  more  time  for  dolomitizing
               waters  to  pass  through them-that much  dolomitization  is  not  penecontemporaneous  but
               due  to continuous  processes  operating over  vast  periods  of time.  These  lines  of argument
               obviously favor the hypothesis of ground-water or connate-water movement as the mechanism
               rather  than  refluxing  or  upward  pumping  of  penecontemporaneously  formed  evaporitic
               brines.
                  Extensive shelves around the Alberta basin  of Canada  provided sites of dolomi-
               tizing fluids  which  migrated basinward: The Late Devonian banks of the Alberta
               basin are extensively dolomitized except where more or less isolated by shales and
               farthest removed from  the platforms.  Note the presence of limestone  in  Golden
               Spike, Redwater, and Swan Hills banks on Fig. IV-20. In the strata exposed in the
               mountains  of  Alberta  there  is  not  much  evidence  of  penecontemporaneously
               deposited shelf evaporite whose formation  may have produced the dolomitizing
               fluids. Slight evaporitic conditions occurred later at a time of regional shallowing
               and silt deposition (Alexo Formation). There is,  however, abundant evaporite in
               the Alberta shelf south of the basin both contemporaneous with the Leduc reefs
               (Duperow Formation) and  also  later  in  the  Devonian (Winterburn  Group and
               Stettler beds).
                  There exist exceptions to all  the  above generalizations  of stratigraphic rela-
               tionships of dolomite and limestone. The chief reason for  this may be the varia-
               tions in timing between dolomitization and calcite cementation which  inhibited
               permeability and early diagenesis.  Often grainstones  are  preserved  as  limestone
               because early cementation rendered  them less  permeable than lime  muds.  Fur-
               thermore,  subsequent diagenetic  history may  to  an  important  extent  overprint
               early,  more regional  patterns  of dolomitization.  Local  leaching  of calcite  from
               partly dolomitized zones along faults, later episodes of secondary dolomitization,
   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335