Page 78 - Carbonate Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy
P. 78

CHAPTER 4: CARBONATE FACIES MODELS                                      69


           evolution; thus, complete separation of environmental and               Bashkirian
           evolutionary controls on the sediment record is impossible.             Valdeteja Formation
           Analysis of the functional morphology of organisms is one               Spain
           of the most successful attempts to extract purely environ-
           mental messages from fossils (Dodd and Stanton, 1981, p.
           222–261).                                                          40
             Fig. 4.17 show examples of information on water depth
           and that can be extracted from fossils in carbonate rocks.
           Note that the presentation remains at the level of high taxo-     Section meter
           nomic categories. These categories (for instance, gastropods,
           echinoderms etc.) existed through most or all of the Phane-        30
           rozoic. For more detail see the excellent exposes in Flügel
           (2004) and Dodd and Stanton (1981, p. 17–115).
                                                                              P
                  SILICICLASTICS AND EVAPORITES IN
                           CARBONATE FACIES                                   20

             Siliciclastics and evaporites (e.g. gypsum, halite) may ap-
           pear in carbonate deposits as in-bed admixtures, as beds
           that alternate with carbonate beds and as formations that
           interfinger laterally with carbonate formations. At the scale       10
           of entire basins, phases of carbonate deposition may alter-
           nate with phases of siliciclastic or evaporite deposition. The
           details of these contacts and the effects of siliciclastics and
           evaporites on carbonate systems differ and need to be ex-
           amined separately.                                                  0
             Siliciclastics are transported into carbonate environments
           from external sources. They may occur in any one of the                -1     0 13  1     2      3
                                                                                              0
                                                                                        δ C ( /00 VPDB)
           carbonate facies belts but the most occmon occurrence is at
           the landward and seaward ends of the carbonate facies spec-
                                                                                       13
                                                                   Fig. 4.14.— Variation of δ C in Carboniferous shoal-water lime-
           trum - in tidal flats and lagoons, and in the basin centers.                        13
           Siliciclastics are least common in platform rim facies, prob-  stones. Pronounced decrease of δ C strongly suggests influx of
           ably because the environment is highly turbulent and de-  isotopically light soil carbon and therefore exposure. Asymmetric
                                                                  shape of the excursion is an additional indicator. P = location of
           viates furthest from the hydrodynamic equilibrium profile  pendent cement of Fig. 4.15. After Immenhauser et al. (2002),
           that siliciclastic accumulations strive to.            modified.
             The direct influence of siliciclastics on carbonate produc-
           tion depends on clastic grain size and on the carbonate fac-
           tory. The most negative effect is caused by influx of clay in cipitation, biotic carbonate production is already greatly re-
           the T factory. Clay stays in suspension for long time, damp- duced (e.g. Fig. 1.16). Thus, the sites of carbonate production
           ening the sunlight and reducing photosynthetic carbonate and evaporite precipitation are adjacent to each other but
           production. Moreover, organic matter, often associated with  do not broadly overlap. Consequently, one observes facies
           clay, increases the nutrient level of the environment and fur- interfingering, particularly between restricted carbonate la-
           ther damages the T production system. C and M factories goons and sabkha evaporites (e.g. Sarg, 2001). Also, diage-
           are rather insensitive to the light reduction caused by ter- netic admixtures of gypsum are common in arid carbonate
           rigenous fines. It seems, however, that the C and M factories tidal flats.
           also function better in clay-poor settings because most ben-  Evaporites in the deep basin centers usually represent
           thic carbonate production depends on firm, clean substrate.  distinct phases of deposition that sometimes alternate with
             Coarse siliciclastic material does not seem to negatively  phases of carbonate deposition. In these instances, the entire
           affect carbonate production in the T and C factories. With  basin oscillates between an evaporite mode and a carbonate
           regard to the M factory, the situation is not entirely clear. An mode such that shelf, slope and basin floor alternatingly re-
           obvious effect for all three factories is that coarse siliciclastics  ceive either carbonate or evaporite material. An example of
           take away accommodation space from the carbonate system.  this relationship is the Permian Zechstein Basin of NW Eu-
             Evaporites precipitate from sea water, like marine carbon-  rope (Fig. 4.18).
           ates. However, at the saturations required for evaporite pre-
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83