Page 160 - Chalcogenide Glasses for Infrared Optics
P. 160

136    Cha pte r  S i x

              The large aluminum chamber is equipped with a door that may be
              sealed, and the chamber evacuated down to a pressure of 50 µm or
              less. Inside was placed a standard inexpensive programmable oven
              equipped with a blower to provide circulating air. The temperatures
              of the molds are controlled using band heaters. The glass blank is
              placed in the mold, the door is closed, and the unit is evacuated. The
              molds and glass blank are heated to the molding temperature, and
              pressure is applied from the cylinder on top of the unit. A few hun-
              dred pounds of force is needed for lenses with 1- to 2-in diameter with
              less than 1000 lb for lenses with almost 6-in diameter. A linear gauge
              indicates when the molds are closed, indicating the lens is formed.
              The molds and lens are cooled slightly, the pressure is released, and
              the unit is vented. After the door is opened, the oven is turned on and
              the glass anneal cycle is started.
                  As results improved, a plan was devised by LMC to prove the
              quality of molded chalcogenide glass optics was equal to that of those
              made by diamond point turning (DPT). A 100-mm FL, F/0.8, 10° field
              of view, two-element lens was designed using Amtir 4 for use with a
              LTC 500 LWIR uncooled bolometer array camera produced by a
              Lockheed Martin company. The front element had a 4.6-in diameter.
              The convex surfaces of both lenses were spherical. The concave
              surfaces were aspheric with kinoforms. The first set of optics was
              diamond turned and coated at AMI. The second was molded and
                                      1
              coated at AMI. Amy Graham  of LMCO showed thermal images that
              demonstrated that optical performance of the camera using the
              molded lenses was essentially the same as when using the DPT lenses.
              Actual physical measurements of two sets of lenses supported this
              statement (Table 6.1).
                 The only parameter that failed was center thickness CT. The prob-
              lem was that not enough glass was being removed under current
              circumstances. The problem was solved by modifying the bottom
              mold surface so that excess glass was more easily forced out when
              pressure was applied. Also, the decision was made to use polished
              blanks that weighed a very small amount greater than the finished
              lens to minimize glass movement.



              Parameter        DPT Part         Molded Part  Delta
              R                1.369            1.369        0.0000
                1
              Sag              0.167            0.1674       0.0004
              Center thickness  0.326           0.3568       0.0308
              Inner diameter   1.529 ± 0.001    1.5245       0.0045
              Outer diameter   1.629 + 0.001    1.6255       0.0035
              TABLE 6.1  Molded versus Diamond Point Turned Optical Elements
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165