Page 172 - Chalcogenide Glasses for Infrared Optics
P. 172

148    Cha pte r  S i x

              for the same small lens in place both top and bottom. This approach
              is much more productive from the standpoint of the number of
              operators and molding units. Mold cost will still be a major factor.
              The business volume must be there to support the effort.
                  Now, AMI is often asked about producing parts in terms of a
              hundred thousand or more. Our molding approach will lend
              itself to producing hundreds or a few thousand perhaps, but not
              a hundred thousand.  A small independent company such as
              Amorphous Materials lacks the resources and the desire for such
              an undertaking.


        6.6  Problem of Refractive Index Change
               When Pressure Molding
              When a glass is pressure-molded, it must be heated above its glass
              transition temperature. One must remember that below that tem-
              perature, glass acts as a solid and will break if pressure is applied
              to reshape it. As for any liquid, if enough pressure is applied, the
              liquid is very slightly compressed. Since refractive index is a mea-
              sure of the concentration of atoms per centimeter cubed, the index
              increases in a positive sense. In optics, a small change in refractive
              index is important, The change needs to be measured to see how
              large a problem exists. Also, a way to avoid the problem may be
              found.


              AMI Infrared Refractometer
              Previous discussions concerning the AMI infrared refractometer have
              pointed out that measurements of a single prism in a single orienta-
              tion are reproducible to a small number in the fourth decimal place.
              In each instance of the data presented, the prism has been removed
              and measured in the same orientation on different days. The data
              presented in Table 6.2 support the claimed accuracy.
                 Previous discussions have pointed out that the lack of perfection
              in the fabricated prism is overcome by measuring the prism in each of



              Date             N @ 3 µm      N @ 4 µm     N @ 5 µm
              8/4/04            2.7616        2.7565       2.7533
              8/6/04            2.7621        2.7569       2.7535
              8/9/04            2.7621        2.7565       2.7534
              Average           2.7619        2.7566       2.7534
                               ±0.00016      ±0.00016     ±0.00007
              TABLE 6.2  Amtir 5 Prism 03-1B, Orientation LD
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177