Page 254 - Challenges in Corrosion Costs Causes Consequences and Control(2015)
P. 254

232                                 CORROSION CONTROL AND PREVENTION

           TABLE 4.17  Cost and Life Expectancy for Overlay and Patching Options for
           Concrete Bridges
                                      Average              Average     Range of
           Type of                      Cost    Range of   Expected    Expected
           Maintenance                 $1m 2   Cost $1m 2  Life (Years)  Life (Years)
           Portland cement concrete     170     151–187       18.5      14–23
             overlay (includes
             latex-modified concrete)
           Bituminous concrete with      58      30–86        10        4.5–15
             membrane
           Polymer overlay/sealer        98      14–182       10        6–25
           Bituminous concrete patch     90      39–141       1          1–3
           Portland cement concrete patch  395  322–469       7         4–10


           would be used on a structure that is not corroding. Furthermore, the use of CP on
           newly constructed bridge components is limited as materials such as epoxy-coated
           rebar provide economic, long-term corrosion prevention for these structures. The
           exception to this is the CP installed on newly constructed bridge pilings exposed
           to marine and brackish waters where corrosion is a serious problem.
              Although in the early stages, CP systems cast a negative image that has improved
           over time, and the current technology for bridge decks has proven to be reliable, and
           improved technology for substructures is being developed. When properly applied
           and maintained CP mitigates corrosion of reinforcing steel and extends the useful life
           of a bridge. However, CP remains an underutilized technology for steel-reinforced
           concrete structures.
              CP systems are characterized by the source of driving voltage that forces the rebar
           to become cathodic with respect to the anode. The two methods for applying CP are
           impressed current CP and sacrificial anode CP (galvanic). In an impressed-current
           CP, an external power source is used to apply the proper driving voltage between the
           rebar and anode. For impressed-current systems, the anode can be a wide range of
           materials as the driving voltage can be adjusted to suit the application and the anode
           material selected. For a sacrificial anode CP system, the driving voltage is created by
           the electrochemical potential difference between the anode and the rebar. Therefore,
           selection of the anode material is more limited.

           4.9.1.9.1  Impressed-Current Cathodic Protection The impressed-current system
           consists of the following:


             1. An external power source.
             2. Variation of voltage with a variable power source.
             3. Variation of applied current.
             4. Designing CP system for almost any current requirement.
             5. Use of CP system in any level of resistivity.
   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259