Page 95 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions
P. 95

QC: —/—
                                 T1: IML
             P2: —/—
  P1: KVU/—
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
                                                          16:6
                                           August 16, 2007
  AT029-02
            AT029-Manual
                                           2. CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPERTIES OF PURE HYDROCARBONS 75
              accurately. However, Part b in this case is also accurate. Es-
              timation of the CH value is less accurate than prediction of  of compounds selected, the source of data, number of data
                                                                  points, and the basis for the evaluation all affect evaluation
              boiling point and gives errors higher than K W .     outcome. The number of numerical constants in a correla-
                                                                  tion and number of input parameters also affect the accu-
                                                                  racy. Usually older methods are based on a fewer and less
            2.9 ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF                        accurate data than newer methods. It would be always useful
            VARIOUS CHARACTERIZATION METHODS                      to test different methods on a set of data that have not been
                                                                  used in obtaining the correlation coefficients. The most ap-
            Generally there are a large number of pure hydrocarbons  propriate procedure would be to compare various methods
            and their properties can be used for evaluation purposes.  with an independent data set not used in the development of
            However, hydrocarbons from certain groups (i.e., paraffins,  any methods considered in the evaluation process. Another
            naphthenes, and aromatics) are more abundant in petroleum  fair comparison of two different correlation would be to use
            fractions and can be used as a database for evaluation pur-  the same database and reobtain the numerical constants in
            poses. Molecular weight, critical properties, and acentric fac-  each correlation from a single database. This was done when
            tor are important properties and their predictive methods  Eqs. (2.52) and (2.53) were compared, as discussed in Sec-
            are presented in this chapter. Errors in any of these proper-  tion 2.4.1. These are the bases that have been used to compare
            ties greatly influence the accuracy of the estimated physical  some of the correlations presented in this chapter.
            property. Methods of estimation of these properties from bulk  Basically there are two parameters for the evaluation of
            properties such as boiling point and specific gravity that are  a correlation. One parameter is the percent average absolute
            presented in this chapter have been in use in the petroleum  deviation (%AAD). Average errors reported in this chapter and
            industry for many years. In some process simulators a user  throughout the book are based on percent relative deviation
            should select a characterization method out of more than a  (%D). These errors are defined as following:
            dozen methods included in the simulator [56]. In each ap-
            plication, the choice of characterization method by the user  (2.134)    estimated value − actual value     × 100
            strongly influences the simulation results. Although there has  %D =         actual value
            not been a general and comprehensive evaluation of various
            characterization methods, a conclusion can be made from                         1                      --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
            individual’s experiences reported in the literature. In this sec-  (2.135)  %AAD =  N  |%D|
            tion first we discuss criteria for evaluation of various methods
            and then different predictive methods for molecular weight,  where N is the total number of data points and summation is
            critical constants and acentric factor are compared and eval-  made on all the points. |%D| is called percent absolute devi-
            uated.                                                ation and it is shown by %AD. The maximum value of |%D|
                                                                  in a data set is referred as %MAD. The second parameter is
                                                                                 2
            2.9.1 Criteria for Evaluation                         called Rsquared (R ) that is considered as an index of the cor-
            of a Characterization Method                          relation when parameters of a correlation are obtained from
                                                                  a data set. A value of 1 means perfect fit while values above
            Methods of characterization and correlations presented in  0.99 generally give good correlation. For a set of data with
            this chapter are mainly based on properties of pure hydrocar-  X column (independent variable) and Y column (dependent
            bons. However, some of these correlations such as Eq. (2.52)  variable) the parameter is defined as
            for estimation of the molecular weight of heavy fractions or
            the correlations presented for prediction of the kinematic vis-  2     [N (    XY ) − (    X )(   Y )] 2
            cosity are based mainly on the properties of fractions rather  (2.136)  R =  [N     X − (    X ) ] × [N    Y − (   Y ) ]
                                                                                            2
                                                                                                      2
                                                                                                              2
                                                                                    2
            than pure compounds. The main application of these correla-
            tions is for basic properties of undefined petroleum fractions  where X and Y are values of the independent and correspond-
            in which bulk properties of a fraction are used to estimate  ing dependent variables and N is the number of data points.
                                                                                                               2
                                                                                                          2
            a desired parameter. Therefore, the true evaluation of these  The     is the summation over all N values of X, X , Y, Y , and
                                                                                                        2
            characterization methods should be made through properties  XY as indicated in the above equation. The R value can be
            of petroleum fractions as will be discussed in upcoming chap-  interpreted as the proportion of the variance in y attributable
            ters. However, evaluation of these methods with properties of  to the variance in x and it varies from 0 to maximum value
            pure hydrocarbons can be used as a preliminary criteria to  of 1.
            judge the accuracy of various correlations. A method, which  For most of the correlations presented in this chapter such
            is more accurate than other methods for pure hydrocarbons,  as Eqs. (2.40), (2.42), or (2.46a) the %AAD for various prop-
            is not necessarily the best method for petroleum mixtures. A  erties is usually given in the corresponding tables where the
            database for pure hydrocarbons consists of many compounds  constants are shown. Most of these properties have been cor-
                                                                                 2
            from different families. However, evaluations made by some  related with an R value of minimum 0.99. Some of these
            researchers are based primarily on properties of limited pure  properties such as kinematic viscosity or CH weight ratio
                                                                                        2
            hydrocarbons (e.g., n-alkanes). The conclusions through such  showed lower values for R . Evaluation of some of the other
            evaluations cannot be generalized to all hydrocarbons and  correlations is made through various examples presented in
            petroleum fractions. Perhaps it is not a fair comparison if  this chapter.
            a data set used to develop a method is also used to evalu-  Nowadays with access to sophisticated mathematical tools,
            ate the other methods that have used other databases. Type  it is possible to obtain a very accurate correlation from any













   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100