Page 75 - Cinematic Thinking Philosophical Approaches to the New Cinema
P. 75

Robert Altman  65

        tor  of the narrative, abandoning  its density  for  the  exclusive  benefit  of its
        functionality). 33
             In contrast, certain directors  (Amiel singles out Keaton, Bresson, and
        Cassavetes)  use  the  body  differently.  Its  comportment  is not  an  "instru-
              .
        ment . .  au  service  d'articulations  narratives"  (instrument  in  the  service
        of  narrative  articulations) 34  but  rather  the  primary  vehicle  for  producing
        what  is to  be known.  In  some  contemporary  films  (and  here  Buffalo  Bill
        is an  exemplar),  "the cinematographic  body  is no  longer  an  object  of  film
        or  knowledge;  rather  it  is  a  model  of  knowledge  via  editing.  . . .  [It  is]
        simultaneously  that which  is filmed  and  that which  (re) organizes the  film
        in the mind / body of the spectator  . . .  [becoming the]  source rather  than
        the object  of cinema." 35
             The "knowledge" to which Amiel  refers requires a distinctive  frame.
        In  the  case  of  Buffalo  Bill,  Sitting  Bull's  body  supplies  a  history  lesson
        by  effectively  subverting  the  image  that  the  show  is trying  to  construct
        (exemplified  in  Salisbury's  opening  soliloquy). The Wild  West  show's  at-
        tempt to turn  history into both entertainment  and  a Euro-American  vin-
        dication,  through  the construction  of a blood-thirsty  savage to be  bested
        by Buffalo  Bill in the ring, is belied by the dignified  body of Sitting  Bull.
        First, Sitting Bull's inflated  reputation  as a savage killer  is supposed  to  be
        reflected  in his size. As he and his entourage ride in when he first joins the
        show  company,  his very  large  associate, William  Halsey,  is mistaken  for
        him.  Sitting  Bull turns  out  to  be quite diminutive. Then  as he  rides  into
        the ring for his appearance in the drama  of Little Big Horn,  Sitting  Bull,
        as a silent and simply adorned  old man, with  a dignity and wisdom  in  his
        carriage that radically transcends the "show" in which he is displayed,  has
        a dramatic  effect  on the audience. Their  initial jeers turn  to applause,  for
        he has  managed  to  move out  of the  antagonistic  role to which  the  show
        has assigned him.
             On another level silence is the historical role to which Native Ameri-
        cans have been consigned  in Euro-America's dominant Indian  imaginary.
        The stoic and  inarticulate  Indian,  an  image perpetuated  in  novels,  paint-
        ings,  and  films,  was part  of  a construction  of the  civilizational  superior-
        ity  that  helped  justify  encroachment  into  Indian  territories.  In  Altman's
        Buffalo  Bill the "silence of the Indians" is portrayed  as a function  of white
        inattention  to  their words. While  Sitting  Bull's  silent  dignity during  the
        staged invention of an alternative Little Big Horn engagement in the show
        subverts one narrative, that  of the violent  blood-thirsty  savage, his  silence
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80