Page 39 -
P. 39

5  Conclusions

                   This work has expanded existing methods of patent analysis, introduced novel methods
                   of Web presence analysis, and applied both to the empirical investigation of energy
                   innovation.  Preliminary results confirm and provide quantification of the notion that
                   different energy technology areas exhibit unique patterns of invention and innovation.
                   Generally, all energy sectors exhibit relatively isolated collaboration networks compared
                   to the rich collaboration networks observed in other sectors (e.g., software and
                   pharmaceuticals).  The macro factors shaping these more collaborative industries help us
                   understand the industrial, regulatory, and technical features that limit energy innovation
                   and result in policy suggestions to drive richer collaboration in energy.


                   For energy as a whole, our results confirm the general notion that policymakers should
                   encourage multidisciplinary collaboration, university and national laboratory
                   commercialization efforts, and tailored support for regional innovation clusters. These
                   insights may be extremely helpful in the development and implementation of two new
                   initiatives, the Energy Frontier Research Centers and the Energy Innovation Hubs.  These
                   initiatives are focused on discrete technology questions with specific innovation targets.
                   The analytical tools now at our disposal could help evaluate what are important social,
                   sectoral, market, and geographic considerations.  For example, the Hubs are envisioned
                   as “multidisciplinary, multi-investigator, multi-institutional integrated research centers …
                   each comprise[d of] a large set of investigators spanning science, engineering, and policy
                   disciplines focused on a single critical national need identified by the Department [of
                   Energy] [89].”  With enough data resolution, the analytical tools described in this work
                   can help evaluate the proposed institutional arrangements and identify structures that can
                   improve the likelihood of success.

                   Importantly, our results indicate that the dynamics of energy innovation are
                   heterogeneous across sectors, and the relative benefits of a particular strategy are unlikely
                   to translate smoothly from one technology area to another. Policies to foster innovation
                   and the deployment of those innovations need to be tailored to each specific technology
                   and its revealed pattern of innovation. This capability is important as the DOE embarks
                   on a series of experiments to drive innovation across multiple sectors.

                   With further work, we expect to increase the size and interconnectedness of the energy
                   patents database, achieve higher resolution on social, geographic, and institutional
                   variables, and refine the statistical methods of investigating linkages between
                   morphologies of invention and the production of breakthroughs.  Together, these
                   objectives will constitute a novel analytic and technical foundation for informing
                   innovation policymaking.















                                                             32
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44