Page 124 - Collision Avoidance Rules Guide
P. 124

COMMENT:
              Paragraphs (a)(i) and (b) are almost identical to Rule 21 of the 1960
              Regulations. The remaining paragraphs are new and constitute one of
              the most fundamental changes made by the  1972 Conference.


              One of  two vessels
              A vessel is only required to maintain her course and speed in a two
              vessel situation. In the unlikely event of one vessel finding herself on
              a collision course with two other vessels  at the same time, being in
              one  case  the  give-way  vessel  and  in  the  other  case  the  stand-on
              vessel, she could not be expected to keep out of the way of one vessel
              and maintain her course and speed for the other.


              One vessel is to keep out of  the way
              Rules 12, 13, 15 and 18 require one of two vessels to keep out of the
              way. The  ‘give-way vessel’ is required to take early and substantial
              action to keep well clear by Rule  16. Rule  17 lays down provisions
              for the other vessel, referred to as the ‘stand-on vessel’.
                Rule  17 does  not  apply  if  the two  vessels  concerned  are not  in
              visual  sight  of  each  other, or if  there  is no risk  of  collision.  This
              means  that,  for  instance,  a  power-driven  vessel  which  detects
              another vessel  approaching from the port  bow, or from more  than
              22.5” abaft the beam, and determines by radar that the bearing is not
              changing, is not required to keep her course and speed if the vessel
              cannot  be  sighted  visually.  There  is  also  no  obligation  to  keep
              course and speed for a vessel  sighted at long range, before  risk of
              collision  begins  to  apply,  even  though  the  bearing  may  not  be
              appreciably changing.
                A  United  Kingdom  proposal  to introduce  a  ‘Long Range Rule’,
              which was intended to make it clear that disengagement was permit-
              ted at long range, was not accepted by the Conference. The Chairman
              stated that he had always assumed that a vessel had the right to take
              action early in an encounter to disengage from what might become a
              dangerous  situation  and  this  view  was  shared  by  other  delegates.
              Court  decisions  have  also  been  made  to  this  effect. The  Rules  in
              Section I1 generally require one of two vessels to keep out of the way
              when risk of collision exists and risk of collision has not been con-
              sidered to apply at long ranges (see pages 36-7).

                                         I05
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129