Page 131 - Collision Avoidance Rules Guide
P. 131

not taking appropriate action as the give-way ship in accordance with the
                regulations. In my judgment, as a matter of good seamanship in the light of
                Rule 17(a)(ii), he should have made a bold alteration of course to starboard.
                Finally, he  should have  put  the engines full astern and the wheel hard  to
                starboard when the ships were about a mile apart, whereas the only action
                he took was to put the wheel hard to starboard as set out above. In failing to
                take that action he was in breach of Rule  17(b).
                  In the Koscierzyna-Hanjin  Singapore  the Hanjin Singapore was
                overtalung the Koscierzyna, approaching from directly astern, on the
                same course. The speed of the Hanjin Singapore was 21  knots, the
                speed  of  the Koscierzyna  was  10.5 knots.  Neither  vessel  took  any
                action before the collision. It was held in the Court of Appeal (1 995)
                that  Hanjin  Singapore  was  mainly  to blame  but  that  Koscierzyna
                should have altered course about 20"-30"  (preferably  to port)  when
                the range had decreased to about one mile. Koscierzyna was held to
                be  15% to blame.

                Compulsory action by the stand-on vessel
                When the stand-on vessel finds herself so close that collision cannot
                be avoided by the give-way vessel alone she is required to take action.
                The  distance  between  the  two  vessels  at  the  moment  when  action
                becomes compulsory for the stand-on vessel will vary with the direc-
                tion and speed of approach and will also depend on the give-way ves-
                sel's  manceuvring characteristics. In a crossing situation this distance
                will usually be about four times the length of the give-way vessel.
                  As it is difficult to determine exactly how close the give-way ves-
                sel could approach before she is unable to avoid collision by her own
                action alone, the stand-on vessel should preferably take action before
                reaching  this  stage. An  alteration  of  course to  starboard to avoid  a
                vessel approaching from the port bow could be a dangerous manceu-
                vre if there is insufficient time to get clear. In the open sea it is sug-
                gested that a stand-on vessel  should not allow a give-way  vessel to
                approach to a distance of less than about twelve times her own length
                in a crossing situation without taking avoiding action.
                  When the vessels are so close that collision cannot be avoided by
                the give-way vessel alone the stand-on vessel is required to take such
                action as will best aid to avoid collision. Rule 17(c) does not apply at
                this  stage,  a  power-driven  vessel  is  permitted  to  turn  to  port  for
                another  power-driven  vessel  on  the port  bow. Turning  towards  the
                other  vessel  may be the best  action to take at close quarters  if one
                                            112
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136