Page 31 - Collision Avoidance Rules Guide
P. 31

given the same degree of privilege as vessels not under command but
                they show different lights and shapes.
                  It could be argued that adverse weather conditions are not really
                exceptional and that  a vessel would not, therefore, be justified in
                showing not under command signals when unable to manceuvre in
                rough seas.
                  At  the  1972 Conference it  was  considered  that  adverse weather
                conditions seriously affecting a vessel’s ability to manceuvre would be
                exceptional circumstances. However, the fact that a vessel’s ability to
                manceuvre is affected by weather conditions does not necessarily mean
                that she is not under command. The conditions must be so exceptional,
                with respect to the particular vessel, as to render her unable to keep out
                of the way of  another vessel by  alteration of course and/or speed in
                order to justify the showing of not under command signals.
                  In addition to vessels which have had a breakdown of engines or
                steering gear, or which have lost a propeller or rudder, examples of
                vessels which are likely to be accepted as being not under command
                under the  1972 Rules are: a vessel with her anchor down but  not
                holding, a vessel riding to anchor chains with anchors unshackled,
                and a sailing vessel becalmed.
                  In the  case of  Glamorgan-I!  Caland, 1893, it was  held  in  the
                House of Lords that the l? Culund was not justified in exhibiting the
                not  under command lights. The speed of  the I?  Culund had been
                reduced from 11 knots to about 4 to 5 knots by  an accident to the
                machinery. The Glamorgun, seeing the red  lights but  not  the side
                lights of the F!  Caland, steamed towards her to offer assistance and
                collided with her. Lord Herschel, the Lord Chancellor, said:

                Under these circumstances I cannot hold that, owing to the disablement of the
                machinery, the risk of its ceasing to work was so imminent that the vessel can
                be said not to have been under command within the meaning of the Rule.


                Mendip Range-Drake
                If a vessel is in such a condition owing to an accident that she can only get
                out of the way of another after great and unusual delay, I think she must be
                considered as ‘not under command’ for the purpose of Article . . . She is not
                able to behave as those on board other vessels meeting her would reasonably
                expect. (Viscount Finlay, 1921)
                In 1969 a collision occurred in the Dover Strait during bad weather
                conditions  between  the  Ziemia  and  the  Djeruda.  The  Djerudu,

                                            12
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36