Page 40 - Collision Avoidance Rules Guide
P. 40

why he did not resort to binoculars, or some other optical aid, to assist him.
              It is difficult, in my view, in any event, to understand why he did not use
              binoculars on seeing the approaching Gorm. Apparently he remained behind
              closed windows in the wheelhouse. (Mr Justice Hewson, 1961)

              Bovenkerk-Antonio  Carlos
              I find that the Antonio Carlos was at fault for bad look-out in the broadest
              sense; namely, faulty appreciation of VHF - information and total absence of
              radar look-out. (Mr Justice Brandon, 1973)

              Vechtstroom-Claughton
              The question of  the use that should properly be made of  facilities that are
              provided is a matter I have discussed with the Elder Brethren, and, if I may
              say so, I am in wholehearted agrement with them that these facilities of
              radar advice are made and supplied and established for the greater safety of
              shipping in  general  and  for  greater  accuracy  in  navigation;  in  fact,  this
              particular  Seacombe radar  station  was  established by  one  of  the  feny-
              operating corporations itself. We can only presume that it was put there for a
              good purpose and to be used in such conditions as prevailed on that morning.
              A vessel which deliberately disregards such an aid when available is expos-
              ing not only herself, but other shipping to undue risks, that is, risks which
              with seamanlike prudence could, and should, he eliminated. As I see it, there
              is a duty upon shipping to use such aids when readily available - and when I
              say ‘readily available’ I am not saying instantly available - and if they elect
              to disregard such aids they do so at their own risk. (Mr Justice Hewson, 1964)

              Radar not working properly
              There  should be no  obligation to  use radar  in  restricted visibility
              if the set is not functioning properly, provided it can be shown that
              there  was a genuine fault.  Everything  possible should be done to
              have the set repaired and brought back into use.
              In an American case Pocahontas Steamship Company-Esso  Amba,
              1950, the judge said:
              There might well be times when the continued use of radar by a navigator
              who was uncertain of  the results he was observing and unwilling to place
              reliance thereon might well be foolhardy and hazardous.
              The radar may have to be temporarily disregarded due to such things
              as excessive interference, or even switched off if its continuing use
              may damage the set.
                                          21
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45