Page 98 - Communication Processes Volume 3 Communication Culture and Confrontation
P. 98

The Indian Legal System  73

                  In addition to discussing the overlapping jurisdiction with the jati,
                historian N.K. Wagle (1998) presents a review of the ways in which the
                kotwal administered justice, especially towards women. The majority
                of cases selected by Wagle demonstrate that the kotwal often took
                women’s complaints seriously. Also, he did not hesitate to punish of-
                fenders, whether men or women, when fault was proven.
                  Some cases involved men’s violence towards women. Harki came
                to the cavdi (police station) to complain that her husband had been
                beating her. The husband was summoned and the investigation proved
                that he was indeed beating his innocent wife. He was fined and had to
                promise not to beat his wife again (ibid.: 17). However, in some cases
                the husband was considered to have rightfully beaten his wife. This was
                the case of Hasan Musalman who beat his wife because she cheated
                on him with Badlya Vani (she participated in sexual misbehaviour,
                badkarma). Hasan also went with a stick to beat Vani. After com-
                mitting these violent acts he went to the cavdi and proved that his
                wife had committed badkarma. It was Vani who was fined (ibid.).
                The information provided by Wagle does not always clarify the reason
                men beat their wives, but when a reason is given it is linked to alleged
                infidelity on the part of the wife. It appears that violence was not re-
                lated to property or dowry issues. It is important to mention that men
                did not have to physically assault a woman to be held responsible for
                injuries or death. This was the case in instances of suicide, in which a
                man (generally the husband) could be held responsible for a woman’s
                suicide (ibid.: 20–21). This was so because women often killed them-
                selves due to their husbands’ physical abuse. In some cases, men were
                also held responsible for the suicide of their mistresses.
                  Other cases presented domestic violence perpetrated by female of-
                fenders. In several cases mothers-in-law ill-treated their daughters-in-
                law. Devki branded her 10-year-old daughter-in-law without the latter
                being at fault. The mother-in-law was fined Rs 45 (ibid.: 17). Women’s
                suicides were sometimes caused by the mother-in-law’s ill-treatment in
                collaboration with other members of the husband’s household (ibid.:
                22–23). In these cases, women as well as men were punished.
                  Although not numerous, some cases illustrate that men were at times
                the victims of women, such as in the case of Pari Kumbharin of Sukravar
                Peth. She beat her husband without him being at fault, which resulted in
                his death. A fine of Rs 95, rather heavy for that time, was imposed on her.
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103