Page 201 - Communication Theory and Research
P. 201

McQuail(EJC)-3281-14.qxd  8/16/2005  6:33 PM  Page 186





                    186                                         Communication Theory & Research




                                                                     — less issues
                                                                         (selection)
                                                      MACRO
                                                       politics
                                                                     — less participants
                                                      solutions          (support)
                                                     mass media
                                                       MESO
                                                      movements
                                                       support
                                                     meso-media


                                                       MICRO
                                                       citizens
                                                      problems
                                                     micro-media

                         FIGURE 14.1  COMMUNICATION PYRAMID–PUBLIC/POLITICAL DEBATE
                         Source:Bardoel (1995)

                         the pyramid – so the assumption goes – lead to greater opportunities for mediated
                         communication on the meso-level, the selection and filtering of relevant issues
                         higher up in the pyramid may be expected to gain in significance. Journalism
                         will therefore, in my view, continue to play a crucial part in recruiting and
                         processing relevant issues from the growing plurality of public spheres towards
                         the political centre (Habermas) or towards the top (in my model). Therefore the
                         function of journalism as a director of social debate will be more essential than
                         ever in a society in which the pressure of communication is steadily increasing.
                         Journalism will not, as in the era of mass media, control the public debate, but
                         can take the lead in directing and defining the public agenda. As journalists are
                         no longer the indispensable intermediaries between the outside world and the
                         public, they must prove their position in this respect. It is important that journalists
                         take this aspect of their intermediary task more seriously than they seem to do
                         at present. [...]



                         Orientating and instrumental journalism


                         The position of journalism as a ‘unified’ profession that encompasses many very
                         different activities at very different levels, seems no longer tenable. The advent
                         of new media formats, based on multimedia applications and the increasing
                         (inter)activity of the user, make this presumption less realistic then it already
                         was. Ideal-typically, I see two sorts of journalism developing (Bardoel, 1993:
                         117–20). First, there is orientating journalism whose job it is to provide a general
                         orientation (background, commentary, explanation) to a general public. Second,
                         there is  instrumental journalism, geared to providing information (functional,
                         specialistic) to interested customers. (I gladly leave to the reader the question of
                         whether all of these activities should be called journalism.)
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206