Page 48 - Communication Theory and Research
P. 48

McQuail(EJC)-3281-04.qxd  8/16/2005  6:29 PM  Page 37




                  The Inflow of American Television Fiction on European Broadcasting    37

                  domestic fiction. Competition caused the public channels to increase their
                  domestic production as well. However, the overall extension of broadcasting
                  hours forced both public and commercial channels to fall back on American
                  imports to fill the many extra television hours.
                    De Bens et al. (1992) provocatively launched the term ‘Dallasification’
                  referring to the non-stop homogenizing inflow of American programmes and
                  obviously not to the Americanizing effect of this content on the attitudes and
                  world perceptions of the viewers. Cultural studies scholars such as Morley
                  (1980, 1992), Fiske (1987, 1991), Featherstone (1991), Ang (1982) and Katz and
                  Liebes (1990) did indeed study the reception of this content and they concluded
                  that no Americanization of worldviews took place. The approach of the two lines
                  of research is fundamentally different: the first analyses the inflow and the origin
                  of content, the second its impact on the viewer.
                    This contribution joins the first line of research. In this study, the programme
                  analysis of the Euromedia Research Group from 1991 (De Bens et al., 1992) was
                  carried out again, on a smaller scale, in 1997. In 1991, 53 European television
                                                                             1
                  stations from 14 European countries were involved in the analysis. In 1997,
                  36 stations from six countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Great
                  Britain and Italy) were examined. The survey included 16 public and 20 commercial
                                                                  2
                  stations, all of them national and general interest channels. As in 1991, the period
                  sampled comprised the last two weeks of January (13–26 January 1997). Similar
                  studies also use a sample of two weeks or even one week partly because of the
                  labour-intensive nature of a programme analysis (Nordenstreng and Varis, 1974,
                  1986; Sepstrup, 1989; De Bens et al., 1992; Buonanno, 1998a, 1998b). However, a
                  period of two successive weeks of programming might be considered
                  unrepresentative since it takes almost no account of seasonal influences on
                  programming. Although the period examined was extremely ‘normal’ and free
                  of special events influencing the programming, we want to emphasize that the
                  results refer first of all to the period examined. The figures were processed
                  and interpreted, and then compared to the figures of the similar investigation
                  from 1991. 3
                    In 1991, the following research questions were asked (De Bens et al., 1992: 82):

                  • Is the position of the American programming industry (fiction) still dominant
                     on the European television market?
                  • Are there noticeable differences between the purchasing and programming
                     strategies of public and commercial broadcasting stations?

                  The same research questions were used in the 1997 programme analysis. No
                  audience analysis is made (e.g. questions of preference). Nor did we consider to
                  what extent European fiction is ‘Americanized’, i.e. modelled on  American
                  examples with adoption of American formats, narrative structures, codes and
                  recipes. 4
                    Finally, and in view of our findings, we try to evaluate the sufficiency of the
                  European Union support measures to promote the European television
                  programme industry.
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53