Page 112 - Communication Theory Media, Technology and Society
P. 112

Holmes-04.qxd  2/15/2005  1:00 PM  Page 95





                                 The Interrelation between Broadcast and Network Communication  95
                  and consumption of information are typically separated in context and in
                  time, a separation which can be unlimited in its degree of abstractness. On
                  the Internet, the six kinds of interaction described by Barr (2000) in the
                  previous chapter (see p. 79) nearly all involve asynchronous forms of
                  mediated connection.
                      However, the Internet is unique in its ability to combine possibilities
                  of synchronous and asynchronous engagement – by extending the prop-
                  erties of speech, writing and the image in combination. The Internet is
                  itself a storage network as well as an interactive environment. Electronic
                  mail may be dyadic and reciprocal, circular within discussion groups, of
                  a broadcast nature broadcasting information, with any particular user
                  transmitting to the many. Powerful search processes are able to retrieve
                  information stored and collated in databanks. The only difference between
                  television and the Internet on these points is that the ‘retrieval’ of content
                  from their respective archives is performed by different people: by media
                  workers on behalf of an audience (in the case of television), or directly by
                  the consumer (in the case of the Internet).


                  The economic interrelationship


                  A fourth continuity between the broadcast and network architectures is
                  the way their economic logics presuppose each other. Economically, net-
                  work media are accompanied by a form of commodification which, as we
                  shall see, constitutes a parasitic reversal of the kind of commodification
                  which typifies broadcast. The form of commodification which is peculiar
                  to a first media age is intertwined with the ever-expanding dimensions of
                            6
                  advertising. As Smythe (1981) shows, television, and any kind of broad-
                  cast media, do not so much sell products as sell the concentration spans
                  of audiences to advertisers. In this relationship the circulation of the sign
                  becomes fused with the circulation of commodities:

                  1  Advertisers sell material commodities to the consumer.
                  2  Broadcasters sell audiences (consumer consciousness) to advertisers
                     (measured by ratings).
                  3  Television programming is marketed by broadcasters to consumers.
                  4  Consumers are also workers who sell their labour-power to corpora-
                     tions in return for the means to purchase commodities.
                  5  The cost of advertising is reflected in the price of the commodity.

                      For step 2 to occur, broadcasters have to be able to offer high numbers
                  of media consumers and high-quality ‘concentration’, which is achieved
                  during ‘prime time’ when higher prices for advertisements are charged. 7
                  This simply cannot be achieved in any medium other than broadcast,
                  which is why, as I have outlined elsewhere (Holmes, 1997), advertising
                  will never be successful, in a ‘stand-alone’ way, on the Internet as it is in
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117