Page 151 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 151

140 COMMUNICATION AND CITIZENSHIP

            making policy decisions. This use also appears perfectly congenial to
            the relationships which are traditionally established between the political
            system and the media and which, as we have already said in part, place
            the latter in a  position  which may be  defined as  non-conflictual  in
            relation to the political system.
              We can now attempt to specify better what is meant by the negotial
            use of political communication and how such use is distributed. First of
            all, we can speak of two spheres of negotiation: in the first, political
            communication performs a function of intermediation  between  the
            majority and the opposition  and, in the second, a function of
            intermediation between  the  factions  of government coalitions. As
            regards the  first  sphere, Marletti speaks of informal  formations  of
            ‘superparties’ (also between the majority and the opposition), defined as

              transversal organizations of  political interests…systems of
              alliances in which  segments  or groups of  a party fight against
              other segments and groups in the same party and, in order to carry
              on this struggle effectively, they become  associated in  various
              ways, openly or covertly, with  segments  and groups  in parties
              other than their own.
                                                    (Marletti 1987:40)

            Again, more simply, as some studies have shown (Parisi and Pasquino
            1984), much  of the  legislation  in Italy is the fruit of a continuous
            process of  intermediation between the majority  and the opposition
            which almost always succeeds in avoiding the open opposition of the
            factions at vote taking. The process of negotiation, which leads to ‘non-
            opposition’, is  carried out in institutional  seats (Parliament,
            Parliamentary Committees, etc.) according to the formal and informal
            rules adopted by them. More often than  not,  the institutional  seat
            involves ‘non-publicity’: this does not mean secrecy or non-access by
            the media, but rather the fact that this negotiation is based on personal
            or group exchanges and starts therefore from a framework consolidated
            by practices  which are, because of  their  habitualness, either of  little
            public importance, or must, in order to  succeed,  be  non-official.
            However, the non-opposition, and therefore the process of non-public
            negotiation, is quite often  the  result of  an  initial public  exchange of
            communications, such as statements, suggestions, etc., published in the
            newspapers or broadcast on television.
              The public nature of the mediation among factions of the governing
            coalition is certainly more important. The mediation is first carried out
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156