Page 21 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 21

10 COMMUNICATION AND CITIZENSHIP

            the dramatic developments in their ownership, control and political use.
            The trends of privatization, conglomeration,  transnationalization and
            deregulation  have amplified and broadened the mercantile logic  of
            media operations,  to the increasing exclusion of  other  norms  (cf.
            Murdock 1990a). Public broadcasting in the USA has always been a
            minor voice  in  the otherwise fully  commercial system. In  Western
            Europe public-service  broadcasting has  seen the historical conditions
            for  its  existence rapidly  dissolving, forcing it to capitulate  further  to
            commercial  imperatives, with the state contributing  to, rather than
            struggling against, these developments (cf. Keane 1989, McQuail and
            Siune  1986). The modern  public sphere seemingly recalls  the
            representative publicness of the  middle ages, where  elites  display
            themselves for the masses while at the same time using the forum to
            communicate among themselves, as  Paolo Mancini’s chapter in this
            book argues.
              The progressive political struggle is not one to  defend the present
            form of state-financed monopolies, which have shown themselves often
            to be elitist, moribund and susceptible to state intervention.  Rather, the
            goal is to establish structures of broadcasting in the public interest, free
            of both state  intervention and  commodification, which optimize
            diversity in terms of information, viewpoints and forms of expression,
            and which foster full and active citizenship (cf. Chapter 4 by Porter and
            Hasselbach in this volume; also Murdock 1990b).
              In  another domain, the  much-heralded information society is
            decidedly not about to make politically useful information and cultural
            expression more available to more people (cf. Schiller 1989, Garnham
            1990, Melody 1990). On the contrary, while technological advances
            have generated  new interfaces between mass media, computers  and
            telecommunication  and satellites, market forces coupled with public
            policy have tended to opt for private gain over the public interest. From
            the standpoint of the citizen, access to relevant information will cost more
            and  more, augmenting differentials in access and further eroding the
            universalist ideal of citizenship (Murdock and Golding 1989).
              Within journalism we also find a growing class-based segmentation of
            the press  (see the chapter here by  Colin Sparks; also Sparks  1988),
            further accelerating  the distance  between  the informed  elite and the
            entertained  masses. While the press accommodates  its  structures  and
            operations  to  the imperatives of commercial logic, it  does not turn a
            deaf ear to the wishes of the state (cf. Curran and Seaton 1989 for a
            discussion of the British case). In TV journalism, it would be difficult to
            argue that  rational public discourse  is enhanced as news  and  public
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26