Page 249 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 249

238 COMMUNICATION AND CITIZENSHIP

              Cutting down on the supply of such information  not only
            disenfranchises people, but runs the risk of cultivating political apathy,
            if not barbarism.
              My main aim here is to review and to clarify by questioning some
            assumptions that have been made in debates about popular culture and
            the way it interfaces with political affairs. Is it useful, for instance, to
            continue to assume that many of the institutions of popular culture not
            only stand  apart from official political  forms and processes, but also
            cultivate a rather inchoate and disabling resistance to them? Resistance
            is, perhaps, too strong a term, since it suggests deliberate action against
            official political cultures and systems. The view more often adopted is
            that the state cultivated is more akin to surly, alienated passivity. I wish
            to explore such questions via a consideration of the relationship between
            the  ‘popular’ or  tabloid press and television. In  so doing, I will also
            question some  of the assumptions that are  typically made about the
            tabloid press.
              Between December 1988 and February 1989 I read and analysed a
            range of tabloid papers, including the Sun, the Daily Mirror, Today, the
            Daily Mail, the Daily Star, the Daily Express, the Sport and, when they
            existed, their Sunday equivalents. Not being a regular reader of any of
            them, I was struck by the volume of material they contained about the
            actors and presenters of television programmes. Apart from programme
            listings and television columns, there were on average about two items
            per day in each of the papers. In the Daily Mirror, there were often as
            many as seven or eight items. In addition to those on television there
            was an almost as abundant supply of similar material on figures in the
            music and cinema industries.
              It  was not just the volume of  material on  ‘show business
            personalities’ that was striking, but also its prominence. Such material
            was often featured as the lead item on the front pages of these papers.
            Public affairs stories, with which the broadsheets would have led on a
            given day, were often relegated to a brief mention on the front pages of
            the tabloids and/or  to somewhat fuller  treatment on other pages. In
            short, then, figures from the world of entertainment were featured
            extensively and prominently in the tabloid papers examined.
              Another striking feature was the form of the journalism adopted. The
            majority of the stories I read were constructed in very different ways
            from those included in the broadsheets. Only very few had any of the
            attributes of serious journalistic styles. Equally few could be seen as
            serving an insider public with the information they needed to have an
            informed view of  such matters  as  the  evolving editorial  policies of
   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254