Page 74 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 74

GOODBYE, HILDY JOHNSON 63

            artefact. Such a perspective allows us to start to make sense of what
            these papers contain and  why  they are so  popular in ways  that  an
            analysis which begins from a comparison with the serious and political
            middle- and upper-class press does not. We can, at the very least, take
            these extremely  important cultural phenomena  as objects of  study  in
            their own right rather than as exemplars of the lamentable debasement of
            popular taste compared with that shown by intellectuals.
              An adequate grasp of the different kinds of cultural artefacts which lurk
            within  what looks like  a plain  simple  newspaper illuminates an
            important feature both  of press history and some  contemporary
            newspaper projects. There have long been attempts to construct a mass-
            circulation popular newspaper based upon the primacy of the political
            content. The detailed history of the life, as opposed to the death, of the
            most important British example of this, the Daily Herald, remains to be
            written,  but it is  clear  that the acquisition  of the title  by  Odhams
            represented a shift away from what had been until then a working-class
            political paper in the narrow sense we have been discussing above. This
            early version of  the paper  had  been closely  tied first to trade-union
            struggles and then to the Labour Party, but it remained a relatively
            small-circulation paper. As a left Labour paper under Lansbury it had a
            chequered history  and even under  the much more moderate official
            leadership  of the TUC its circulation  remained around  500,000. The
            development of its circulation in the 1930s does not appear to have been
            the result of the ‘serious’ content of the paper: one ex-editor argued that
            the sharp rise in circulation was the result of ‘every sort of circulation
            stunt’. 16
              What is more, there was even in its high period a perceived conflict
            between the serious and the popular elements of its content. Another ex-
            editor, Francis Williams, wrote that:

              To be its editor…was, I found, no easy task; particularly if one
              was, as I was, more interested in serious news and its significance
              than in bright headlines or display and wanted the paper to be the
              mirror of intelligent cultural movements into the bargain. 17
            Williams found  himself engaged  in  a continual struggle  between the
            publishers and the party. Odhams were prepared to honour their pledge
            to keep the Daily Herald a Labour Party paper and to devote considerable
            space to publicizing the  views of  the Labour and  Trade Union
            leadership, but they were also a commercial concern who had devoted
            very considerable resources  to  gaining a mass circulation and they
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79