Page 35 - Compact Numerical Methods For Computers
P. 35

Formal problems in linear algebra               25
                      In other words, we have
                                                        +
                                                      A A = 1 .                          (2.34)
                                                              n
                      When A has only k linearly independent columns, it will be satisfactory if



                                               +
                                             A A =
                                                                                         (2.35)





                      but in this case x is not defined uniquely since it can contain arbitrary components
                      from the orthogonal complement of the space spanned by the columns of A. That
                      is, we have
                                                     +          +
                                                 x = A b + (1  – A A) g                  (2.36)
                                                           n
                      where g is any vector of order n.
                        The normal equations (2.22) must still be satisfied. Thus in the full-rank case, it
                      is straightforward to identify
                                                    +    T   -l  T
                                                   A  = (A A) A .                        (2.37)
                      In the rank-deficient case, the normal equations (2.22) imply by substitution of
                      (2.36) that
                                           T       T   +     T    T   +
                                          A Ax = A AA b+(A A – A AA A)g                  (2.38)
                                                  T
                                               = A b .
                      If
                                                      T
                                                     A AA +  = A T                       (2.39)
                                                                      +
                      then equation (2.38) is obviously true. By requiring A  to satisfy
                                                         +
                                                      AA A = A                           (2.40)
                      and
                                                        + T     +
                                                    (AA )  = AA                          (2.41)
                      this can indeed be made to happen. The proposed solution (2.36) is therefore a
                                                                               +
                      least-squares solution under the conditions (2.40) and (2.41) on A . In order that
                                                                                        T
                      (2.36) gives the minimum-length least-squares solution, it is necessary that x x be
                      minimal also. But from equation (2.36) we find
                                T     T   + T  +    T    +  T     +       T     +   T  +
                              x x = b (A ) A b + g (1 – A A) (1 – A A)g + 2g (1 – A A) A b (2.42)
                      which can be seen to have a minimum at
                                                        g = 0                            (2.43)
                       if
                                                           +
                                                      (1 – A A)  T
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40