Page 15 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 15
P1: GCV
0521835356agg.xml Hallin 0 521 83535 6 February 1, 2004 14:36
Preface
We don’t remember exactly when the idea of this book was born. Proba-
bly at the moment we were finishing our first joint enterprise, “Speaking
of the President,” which was published in 1984, we already had a strong
sense that this kind of research was extremely promising and that we
should try to do it more systematically and on a broader scale. Little
by little, through other experiences of comparative studies on particu-
lar subjects, we conceived the idea of this project. Briefly, what we have
set out to do is to find out whether it is possible to identify systematic
connections between political and mass media structures. We were cu-
rious, in particular, whether it made sense to think in terms of distinct
models of journalism and of the media-politics relationship. This has
been an ambition in the field of communication since Four Theories of
the Press, and it also seemed to us, as we began to survey the variety
of media systems in Western Europe and North America, that there
really were clusters of media system characteristics that tended to co-
occur in distinct patterns. We introduce a schema centered around
three models of journalism and media institutions in the pages that
follow – though with plenty of qualifications about the variation that
exists within and between actual media systems belonging to these three
models. We have tried to carry out this effort at comparative analysis
empirically, without having in mind any ideal professional model of
reference against which other systems would be measured – eschewing
the normatively centered approach that, as we will argue in the pages
that follow, has held back comparative analysis in communication. At
the same time, we will try in this book to assess weaknesses and strengths
of each media system model as a support for democracy; this much of
the normative orientation of communication theory is certainly worth
maintaining.
xiii