Page 164 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 164

P1: GLB/IRK/kaa  P2: KAF
                          0521835356c06.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 28, 2004  21:0






                                                       The Three Models

                                            THE EARLY ROOTS OF THE PRINT PRESS
                                The countries of Northern Europe – both on the continent and in
                                Britain – pioneered the development of press freedom. The principles of
                                publicity that characterize both parliamentary democracy (Humphreys
                                1996) and the press as a social institution developed early and strongly.
                                In some cases the development of the first newspapers was linked to
                                merchant capitalism while in other cases it was linked to political or reli-
                                gious struggles. As we shall see more fully in a later section of this chapter,
                                the strong development of the press in Northern Europe is related to the
                                weakness of the ancien r´egime relative to rising forces of liberalism. The
                                exact historical pattern varied from country to country, but in one way or
                                another the development of print media tied to a growing literate mid-
                                dle class is central to the media history of all the Democratic Corporatist
                                countries.
                                   In Germany and in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, out of which
                                Austria was formed, both the aristocracy and the absolutist state re-
                                mained strong much longer than in the smaller countries. In these coun-
                                tries, as in the Polarized Pluralist countries, the transition to a liberal or-
                                der was longer and more conflictual. Nevertheless, the development of a
                                commercial and industrial middle class was sufficient to support many
                                of the institutions of the new social order, including a strong mass-
                                circulation press.
                                   In the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Belgium, merchants – whose
                                widespreadcommercialinterestsmadethemthefirstconsumersofnews-
                                papers – dominated society from a very early period. In Scandinavia
                                industrialism did not develop strongly until the late nineteenth century.
                                Nevertheless, feudal institutions were not as strong as in other parts of
                                Europe, and the emerging urban middle class, often in alliance, as we
                                shall see, with an independent peasantry, rose to power relatively early –
                                and played a key role in the development of the press. As Gustafsson
                                and Hadenius point out, referring to what is often considered Sweden’s
                                first modern paper, established in 1830: “mine owners, merchants
                                and intellectuals – pillars of pre-industrial society – constituted the
                                Aftonbladet readership. They needed an efficient means of commu-
                                nication and the paper provided it” (Gustafsson and Hadenius 1976:
                                32). Aftonbladet not only carried advertising and political and commer-
                                cial information useful in the emerging market society, but expressed
                                the desire of the new middle class for liberal political and eco-
                                nomic reforms (Hadenius and Weibull 1999). “Conservative forces,”



                                                              146
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169