Page 69 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 69

P1: GLB/kaf/KAA  P2: kaf
                          0521835356c03.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 20, 2004  15:21






                                          The Political Context of Media Systems

                                          Table 3.1 Consensus vs. Majoritarian Politics

                                   Majoritarian Politics       Consensus Politics
                                   1. Winning party concentrates  Power sharing
                                     power
                                   2. Cabinet dominance        Separation of power between
                                                                 legislative and executive
                                   3. Two-party system         Multiparty system
                                   4. Plurality voting system  Proportional representation
                                   5. Clear distinction between  Compromise and cooperation
                                     government and opposition   between opposing forces



                                Majoritarianism, as we will try to show in Chapter 7 when we discuss
                              the Liberal systems where this pattern prevails, tends to be associated
                              with the notion of the journalist as a neutral servant of the public as a
                              whole, rather than as a spokesperson of a particular political tendency
                              or social group, and with internal rather than external pluralism, though
                              as we shall see the British press deviates significantly from this pattern.
                              It is part of the political culture of a majoritarian system – at least of a
                              long-standing majoritarian democracy – that the parties compete not
                              to gain a greater share of power for their particular segment of society,
                              but for the right to represent the nation as a whole, and it may be that
                              in this sense the notion of neutral professionalism is more natural in
                              a majoritarian system. Majoritarianism probably also tends to be as-
                              sociated with the development of catch-all political parties with vague
                              ideological identities, appealing to a wide public across social divisions,
                              though this is much more true of the American presidential system than
                              of the British Westminster system. Where catch-all parties predominate,
                              it makes sense that catch-all media should also develop. Consensus sys-
                              tems, on the other hand, are typically multiparty systems, and external
                              pluralism (as defined in the previous chapter) is more likely in the media
                              system of multiparty polities, along with other characteristics of political
                              parallelism.
                                There is a particularly clear and direct connection between patterns
                              of consensus or majoritarian rule and systems of broadcast governance
                              and regulation that tend to follow patterns similar to those that pre-
                              vail in other spheres of public policy. The most basic feature of politics
                              in consensus systems is power sharing, and the strongest examples of




                                                            51
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74