Page 60 - Comparing Political Communication Theories, Cases, and Challenge
P. 60

P1: kic/kaa/Ivo  P2: KaF
                          0521828317agg.xml  CY425/Esser  0521828317  May 22, 2004  10:57






                                               Daniel C. Hallin and Paolo Mancini

                                perspective of the “common citizen” (Neveu 1999) – are characteristics
                                of commercial media, more than of television as a technology, and were
                                developedonlytoalimitedextentunderthepublicservicesystem(Hallin
                                and Mancini 1984).
                                   The commercial “deluge,” as many discussions have characterized it,
                                did not come to Europe in full force until the 1980s, and this certainly
                                suggests that we should be careful about exaggerating the social impact
                                of commercial television. Secularization was well underway before com-
                                mercial television fully emerged. As the case of TROS in the Netherlands
                                suggests,however,commercialforceswerebeginningtomakethemselves
                                felt in a variety of ways before the 1980s: through import of American
                                programs and imitation of American practices, through advertising in
                                some European systems, through pirate and transborder broadcasting,
                                including the important case of the p´erif´eriques in France, and with
                                the breakdown of the public service monopoly in Italy at the end of
                                the 1970s. It is certainly plausible that if Europe was becoming more
                                of an individualist, consumer society in the 1960s, television and ra-
                                dio did play some role, despite the limits imposed by the public service
                                system.


                                                         CONCLUSION
                                One way to synthesize the many influences discussed in this chapter
                                would be to say that it is driven at the deepest level by the growth of a
                                secularized market society. This is the core of what is generally referred
                                to as modernization, and the deeper meaning of Americanization. It is a
                                global process, and certainly does involve diffusion of cultural and social
                                practices from one country to another, and specifically from America to
                                Europe. At the same time it is clearly rooted in forces internal to Europe –
                                including a deliberate effort to make Europe a “common market” inte-
                                grated with the world economy – and internal to each individual nation
                                state. The mass media play an important role in this process, and one of
                                its principal effects is to shift social and political power to a significant
                                extent from the “aggregating” institutions of an earlier era – political par-
                                ties, churches, trade unions, and other “peak organizations” – toward
                                the mass media. It involves a shift, in Mazzoleni’s (1987) terms, from
                                “political logic” in the process of communication to “media logic,” the
                                latter being a complex phenomenon shaped by technical requirements of
                                the media, the evolution of journalistic professionalism and commercial




                                                               40
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65