Page 112 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of New Media On
P. 112

WHO OWNS THE WORDS?           81

        the class, outside readers should also be invited to read the work and
        respond to what they find. Something as simple as asking for external
         evaluations  for  e-texts  moves current  writing  assessment practices
        toward the more authentic evaluations a "real" writer  receives when
         submitting a paper for review. Moreover, this type of assessment tool
        offers  a dialogic exchange between writers and readers and it  shows
        writers  how  their  work  creates an  identity  in  cyberspace and  how
        others come to interpret this  identity.
           These little evaluative add-ons  not  only  take  the burden  of as-
        sessment away   from  a single instructor;  they  also show  students
        how various readers' needs are met. It is possible that small groups
        of teachers and students  familiar with e-texts  could share the  pro-
        cess  of  evaluation,  much  like art  or  film  departments  conduct  a
        day-long critique of student  work.  By providing  a space in the ac-
        tual text  or  site where people could access reviews of a  student's
        work,  writing faculty begin to educate others  about what  charac-
        teristics make a hypertext or a web site or a MOO or a blog good or
        poor. An archive of comments can be constructed as well, so  stu-
        dents and instructors  could return  to various  sites to  study  what
        respondents valued or rejected in the work. Creating an archive of
        comments   accessible to  students  and  instructors  is an  important
        step for avoiding what  has been described as the  "fictionalizing" of
        student writers in traditional portfolio contexts (Schuster, in Black,
        Daiker,  Sommers, & Stygall,  1992,  p.  319). Although  a  reflective
        narrative can still be constructed to explain the student writer's ex-
        perience, this narrative is built on a series of comments analogous
        to the text and its production instead of on the students'  personali-
        ties, classroom demeanors, or rhetorical skill in writing  reflective
        letters. This seems to be the most workable way to establish  an au-
        thentic  assessment  of  student-owned  e-texts  that  respects  the
        rights  of the students  and the demands for learning  outcomes that
        programs, departments, and institutions  now  expect for courses.

                IS THE CULTURE OF    COMPOSITION TOO     RIGIDLY
              CONSTRUCTED TO ALLOW FOR        COMPLETE STUDENT
                           OWNERSHIP OF THE TEXT?


        As someone who   has  studied and  taught  in Composition for more
        than  17 years,  I want  to  believe Composition's  culture  is  not  so
        driven  by  instructors'  control  that  full  student  ownership  of  the
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117