Page 82 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of New Media On
P. 82

TRANSFORMING TEXTS          51

         have more authority in working  with e-texts than many   of their
         professors. Compositionists should surely expect this trend  toward
         hyperliterate computer  users entering their  classes to  continue in
        the  future,  because  state  legislatures,  public  and  private  K-12
         schools,  and  parents  have  made  teaching  with  technology  a  pri-
         mary goal for elementary and secondary education in the 21 st cen-
         tury.  Until  Composition's  culture  as  a  whole  recognizes  the
         necessity  for  its  practitioners  to  have  more  than  a  basic  under-
         standing  of how to teach writing using computers and until com-
        position  and  rhetoric  programs  implement  a  series of courses for
        graduate  students  and current  writing faculty  to show them  how
        to incorporate these two technologies, it will be difficult to promote
        the development of reasonable, pedagogically sound measurement
        practices  for  networked  writing  beyond  what  currently  exists.
        While the  field awaits the occurrence of these events, it opens itself
        to external charges of a lack in accountablity that may not be true
        but  still cannot  be defended because little has been articulated.
           For the  sake of argument,  let us  say that Composition's  conver-
        gence  between  computer  technology  and  writing  assessment  can
        usher in a more humane,  more performative, student-centered  type
        of  evaluation  process than  has  existed  to  date.  The push  for  elec-
        tronic  portfolio  grading,  most  recently  discussed by  Trent Batson
        (2002)  and  the  NCTE statement  on writing  assessment  (2001), re-
        flects this growing trend toward  greater student autonomy  in writ-
        ing  assessment.  Brian  Huot's  most  recent  work  (2002) proposed
        that it is time for Composition to (re)articulate writing  assessment,
        and I concur. Not only do compositionists  need to learn how to read
        and respond differently,  as Huot elegantly argued, but  writing  spe-
        cialists have to think  differently  about what  a text  is in the  writing
        classroom and how   a text  functions in cyberspace. This means  in-
        structors  have  to  become more  comfortable with  the  place  of  the
        mundane   text  in the teaching of  writing.
           As  Composition  makes  the  turn  toward  introducing  mundane
        texts  in writing  classes,  even  at  the  first-year  levels,  the  field  will
        eventually  see writing  that is less academic and more performative
        in public spaces. A synergy between visual and textual rhetoric must
        also emerge over time to  motivate  a change in the  presentation  of
        what  writing  is in  this  environment  and  how  students'  multiple
        literacies become engaged in the writing process. Mundane texts can
        help  students  and  instructors  understand  this  interconnectedness
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87