Page 141 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 141

108          CHAPTER 4


        tronic text is a blog, a MOO, a web site, or hypertext, the work can be
        evaluated  on  a full  range of technical, mechanical,  aesthetic,  affec-
        tive,  rhetorical,  intellectual,  and  social criteria  defined  by  the  in-
        structor,  the  program,  or  the  department.  Broad's  DCM system
        depends on the deep assessment approach put forward earlier in this
        chapter in order to collect and discuss student  networked writing in
        a thoughtful manner. Through an instructor's  use of the DCM,  stu-
        dents  can  chart  their  progress  in  various  areas  and  note  where
        growth  and  slippage occur across  assignments  or  over time.  For a
        program or a department, the adoption of a model like the DCM pro-
        vides the context in which to discuss the evaluation of students' elec-
        tronic  texts  to  enact  curricular  or  instructional  changes  that
        improve writing  instruction  for networked environments. As I pro-
        pose in the next section, the DCM approach leads Composition Stud-
        ies to  redefine  validity  and  reliability in ways  that  mesh with  the
        growing  use of e-texts  in the writing  classroom.

                DEVELOPING A "NEW"      VALIDITY AND  RELIABILITY


        The notion of deep assessment  and  the  development  of deep assess-
        ment programs like the  OLR, TOPIC/ICON, and DCM is that they re-
        place the flat,  objectivist descriptions of validity  and reliability with
        an enriched overview of the students' real processes and contexts for
        writing.  One critical  effect  of technological convergence on  assess-
        ment  is the  destabilization of the  scientific  method  used to  ground
        writing  assessment by the computer's  ability  to emphasize the so-
        cial values and subjectivity  present  in evaluation. This  destabilizing
        of  established  understandings  inherent  in  the  scientific  method
        surely changes how writing  undergoes evaluation.
           A start in this new direction for assessment begins with a revised
        set  of assumptions  concerning writing,  validity,  and  reliability.  In
        place of the older principles that guide assessment and were outlined
        earlier in this chapter, a new collection of components drives evalua-
        tions in computer-enhanced  writing  courses:


           •  Writing is multidimensional.  The convergence of these two  tech-
             nologies has displaced the earlier concept that writing  is an or-
             derly  and  regular  activity.  Hypertext,  MOOs,  Daedalus
             Integrated Writing Environment  (DIWE), and archives of  syn-
             chronous and asynchronous   e-mails indicate that writing  runs
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146