Page 194 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 194

REMEDIATING WRITING ASSESSMENT        161

        assessment. This is how the field can move toward  a language that
        accommodates coherence in electronic text  assessment.
           What these newer electronic writing  assessment genres suggest is
        that in convergence, writing assessment has to account for the types
        of transparency that occur when writing is publicly situated. Part of
        the  new accountability  in electronic writing  assessment has  to  re-
        flect the social and technical aspects as well as the aesthetic elements
        required for readers to appreciate the e-text before us. Consequently,
        a remediated form  of writing  assessment depends on a sense of im-
        mediacy that permits  the rubric to  "disappear."  That  is, the  context
        for  assessment  is  seamless from  the  process. In  many  ways,  Bob
        Broad's Dynamic Criteria Mapping  system (2003) opens the way for
        immediacy   to  occur  in  computer-focused writing  assessment. In-
        stead  of rigidly  following  sets  of descriptors  made  for  paper  texts,
        writing  teachers can begin to account  for the  multiplicity of media
        and the students' facility with such media that exist to create e-texts;
        it is this  context  of how  the writer  selects and uses the appropriate
        media that frequently determines whether  an electronic text is well
        received. The context and the media also allow instructors  to observe
        changes in the  student  as author,  how  he or  she responds  rhetori-
        cally to these new contexts and media, the aesthetic determinations a
        writer  must  make,  the  growth  in  agency  and  ethos,  and  the
        development of parts  to  whole.
           In a remediated understanding of writing  assessment, composit-
        ionists  must come to recognize that in an e-text  various  media si-
        multaneously   "honor, acknowledge, appropriate, and implicitly or
        explicitly  attack  one  another"  (Bolter  &  Grusin,  2002,  p.  87).
        Therefore,  writers have to adopt  differing  strategies to  accommo-
        date changes in the media. Assessment then emerges as an  ongoing
        way   to  sanction  or  discourage  specific  strategies  in  context—
        through  either  academic,  political,  economic,  or  cultural  forces—
        regarding the decisions a writer  makes. Still, serious questions re-
        main regarding how, or if, standards  can be maintained  in  writing
        instruction  given  a  remediated  form  of  writing  assessment
        through  converged technologies.

              REMEDIATION AND THE QUESTION OF         STANDARDS

        Few writing  instructors  have to  go far  before  hearing some com-
        plaint about the current state of students' writing:  E-mails from
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199