Page 194 - Confronting Race Women and Indians on the Frontier, 1815 - 1915
P. 194

CHAPTER  FIVE


            include  censure, as white women did.7 6  Given women's f e ar of drunk
            men, women had f a r less  tolerance  than men f o r Indians who  drank.
            Instead  of passing judgment on Indian  drinkers, men condemned the
            "unprincipled men" who "for the sake  of gain, will supply them with
            the means of drunkenness  and destruction."77
                Men's attitudes were  not so flexible when they saw natives eating
            vermin. T y pically,  men f o und  this  a "disgusting  practice." They  were
            f u rther  repulsed  by  Indians' "apparent  relish"  and "evident  gusto."78
            One f o rty-niner who "saw  a woman  catching vermin f r om the head
            of a little boy, with which she pieced out her supper" never again ate
            Indian cooking. He said the woman had "fully satisfied his curiosity as
            to their epicurianism."79
                Concerning Indians' requests f o r gifts  or appropriating goods f o r
            their own use, men were almost as vitriolic as women. Epithets such as
            "indolent,"  "thieving,"  and  "begging"  punctuated  men's  accounts.80
            Coming f r om a Christian society that emphasized hard work, white men
            could not countenance begging. In addition, they seemed unaware that
            white  migration  had  caused  Indians'  poverty. They  made  fr equent
            derogatory references to panhandling and pilfering Indians. Only occa­
            sionally  would  a  man  observe  industry  or  ingenuity  in  American
            Indians. But, unlike women, men refrained fr om praising the inventive­
            ness  of Native Americans. Although white men may have been slower
            than women  to condemn  cultural practices and rituals, they were also
            slower to recognize a spark of imagination, originality ,  or enterprise.81
            Evidently, male evenhandedness worked both ways.
                Men did, however,join women in learning to discriminate among
            tribal groups of American Indians.82 Men's opinions demonstrated great
            consensus. The  Pawnees were "hostile." The  Snake  Indians were "the
            greatest  beggers  in  the  world."  California's  "mission"  Indians  were
            f r iendly to settlers. 83 Like white women, white men described the Sioux
            as  powerful,  wealthy ,  and  beautiful  in  f o rm,  figure,  and  dress. The
            "Diggers," however, were the target of universal opprobrium. Seen as a
            "thievish and rascally race," they were considered to exist in "the lowest
                                 ,,
            state of human existence. 84
               White  men  who  dealt  with  Indians  or  disguised  themselves  as
            Indians fu rther upset migrants and settlers.Apparently, some white men,



                                         1 8 6
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199