Page 23 - Confronting Race Women and Indians on the Frontier, 1815 - 1915
P. 23

FRONTIER  P  H  I L OSOPHY: AMERICAN  D  I S COU S E
                                                              R
              hearth, women would protect traditional values, yet they were  not to
              interfere  in  any  essential  way  with  the  developments  that were  cata­
              pulting America toward prosperity and power.
                  It may seem  odd that women accepted doctrines that had obvious
              limitations, but there  were many reasons f o r them to  do  so. It would
              have been f a lse of women to naysay the importance of wifehood, moth­
              erhood, and f a mily care in their lives. After all, they lived in a time when
              marriage  and  childbearing were believed to  be women's top-ranking
              goals. Nor could they reject the belief that women were more moral,
              pure, and virtuous than men, f o r this not only gave them a modicum of
              power in  their  homes, but  established  their  authority  over men  con­
              cerning  domestically  related  matters. Also, interpreted  and applied in
              certain  ways, domestic  teachings  offered women the  hope  of f m ding
              meaning in a world radically altered fr om that of their grandmothers­
              or even of their mothers-where a woman's labor often had been crit­
              ical to f a mily survival. For mill girls who had fo llowed women's work
              of spinning  and  weaving  fr om  their  homes  to  f a ctories,  domesticity
              assured them that they had not lost significance as wives and mothers.
              For middle- and upper-class women, seemingly devoid of purpose and
              trapped in their homes while the menfolk left to labor in another part
              of the city, domesticity justified their very existence. Consequently ,  even
              "intellectual"  women  such  as  Margaret  Fuller,  editor  of  the
              Transcendentalist journal The Dial and author of rtOman in the Nineteenth
              Century,  who  railed  in  her  1852  memoirs  against  the  limitations  of
              women's "sphere," could see potential usefulness in the concept of sep­
              arate spheres fo r men and women.8
                  Because  progressive  thinkers  concerning women's  roles,  such  as
              Adams and  Fuller, accepted the potential of the separate-spheres  con­
              cept, it is  unsurprising  to  discover that many other American women
              also  adopted the  notion. W o men were beginning to  see that the phi­
              losophy known as domesticity held out certain attractions. Even women
              who intended to move westward saw merit in domestic ideals. Like their
              sisters, they were  open  to  the  possibility that their otherwise subordi­
              nate  f e male  roles  would  earn  status,  respect, and  esteem  as  women's
              moral impact upon society was  amplified and idealized.
                  The implications of domesticity f o r women's roles and status could



                                            15
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28