Page 151 - Construction Waterproofing Handbook
P. 151

3.40   CHAPTER THREE
                      cracks or to adjust to thermal movement. Additionally, it is difficult to repair the water-
                      proofing membrane layers once the asphalt is installed. There is no way to remove overlays
                      without destroying the base coat membrane. Asphaltic systems are not recoatable. For
                      maintenance, they must be completely removed and reinstalled. (See Table 3.17.)

                             TABLE 3.17  Asphalt Deck-Coating Properties
                                         Advantages                   Disadvantages
                             Protection of membrane by asphalt overlay  Weight added to structure
                             Longer wearing capability          Movement capability restricted
                             Thickness of applied system        Inaccessibility for repairs


                      Latex, neoprene, hypalon
                      Deck coatings are available in synthetic rubber formulations, including latex, neoprene, neo-
                      prene cement, and hypalon. These formulations include proprietary extenders, pigments, and
                      stabilizers. Neoprene derivatives are soft, low-tensile materials and require the addition of a
                      fabric or fiberglass reinforcing mesh. For traffic-wear resistance, this reinforcing mesh
                      enhances in-place performance properties such as elongation and crack-bridging capabilities.
                      Reinforcing requires that the products be trowel applied rather than roller or squeegee applied.
                         Trowel application and a finish product thickness of approximately   4 in increase the
                                                                                1
                      in-place costs of these membranes. They also require experienced mechanics to install the
                      rubber derivative systems. Trowel applications, various derivatives, and proprietary for-
                      mulations provide designers with a wide range of textures, finishes, and colors.
                         Rubber compound coatings have better chemical resistance than most other deck-coat-
                      ing systems. They are manufactured for installation in harsh environmental conditions
                      such as manufacturing plants, hospitals, and mechanical rooms. They are appropriate in
                      both exterior and interior applications.
                         Design allowances must be provided for finished application thickness. Deck protru-
                      sions, joints, wall-to-floor details, and equipment supports must be flashed and reinforced
                      for membrane continuity and watertightness. Certain derivatives of synthetic rubbers
                      become brittle under aging and ultraviolet weathering, which hinders waterproofing capa-
                      bilities after installation. Manufacturer’s literature and applicable test results should be
                      reviewed for appropriate coating selection. (See Table 3.18.)

                      Urethanes
                      Urethane deck coatings are frequently used for exterior deck waterproofing. These are avail-
                      able for both pedestrian and vehicular areas in a variety of colors and finishes. Urethane sys-
                      tems include aromatic, aliphatic, and epoxy-modified derivatives and formulations.

                             TABLE 3.18 Latex, Neoprene, and Hypalon Deck-Costing Properties

                                    Advantages              Disadvantages
                             Excellent chemical resistance  Trowel application required
                             Good aging and weathering  Fabric reinforcement required
                             Good wear resistance     High cost
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156