Page 62 - Construction Waterproofing Handbook
P. 62

2.26   CHAPTER TWO
          TABLE 2.3 Comparison of Positive and Negative Waterproofing Systems*

          Positive systems                          Negative systems
                                                Advantages
          Water is prevented from entering substrate surface  Accessible after installation
          Substrate protected from freeze-thaw cycles  Concrete substrate is allowed to moist cure
          Substrate is protected from corrosive     Eliminates need for subslabs and well pointing for
          chemicals in groundwater                  foundation waterproofing
                                               Disadvantages
          Concrete may not cure properly            Limited to application of cementitious systems
          System inaccessible for repairs after installation  No protection from freeze-thaw cycles
          Subslabs and well pointing necessary      No protection of substrate or reinforcing steel from ground
          for foundation waterproofing              water and chemicals
          *With all positive systems, concrete should cure properly (up to 21 days) before application of any waterproofing materials.


                      ● Swimming pools
                      ● Cooling tower basins
                         In new construction, where costs and scheduling are critical, these systems are partic-
                      ularly effective. They do not require a completely dry substrate, and concrete does not
                      need to be fully cured before application. This eliminates well pointing and the need for
                      water control during construction. These systems apply to both walls and floors at one
                      time, thereby eliminating staging of waterproofing operations. No subslabs are required
                      for horizontal applications in new construction preventative waterproofing installations.
                      Finally, in cases such as elevator pits, the waterproofing is completed almost any time
                      during construction as best fits scheduling.
                         All cementitious systems are similar in application and performance but repel water dif-
                      ferently by the proprietary additives of a manufacturer’s formulations. Cementitious sys-
                      tems have several mutual advantages, including seamless application after which no
                      protection board installation is necessary.
                         All cementitious materials lack crack bridging or elastomeric properties but are success-
                      fully applied to below-grade areas that do not experience thermal movement. However,
                      below-grade areas are subject to freeze-thaw cycling and structural settlement. If these
                      cause movement or cracking, a cementitious system will crack, allowing water infiltration.

                      Metallic systems
                      Metallic materials contain a mixture of sand and cement with finely graded iron aggregate
                      or filings. When mixed with water to form a slurry for application, the water acts as an
                      agent permitting the iron filings to oxidize. These materials expand due to this oxidizing,
                      which then effectively seals a substrate and prohibits further transmission of water through
                      the material. This system is one of the oldest methods used for waterproofing (first patented
                      in 1906) and remains today an effective waterproofing system. (See Fig. 2.35.)
                         Metallic systems are applied in two or three coats, with the final coat a sand and
                      cement mixture providing protection over base coat waterproofing where exposed. This
                      final coat seals the metallic coats and prevents leaching or oxidization through paints or
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67