Page 120 - Contemporary Cultural Theory
P. 120

TYPES OF FEMINISM

            fact occupied a highly salient position within second wave feminist
            discourse. Michéle Barrett insists that she “can find no sustained
            argument as to why feminists should be so interested in literature”. 11
            Perhaps so. But parts of the answer are provided: firstly, by the fact
            that feminist intellectuals have happened to be already employed
            disproportionately in teaching in the humanities, and especially in
            literature; secondly, by the widespread feminist perception of women’s
            oppression as having cultural, rather than biological, roots; and thirdly,
            by the way in which feminists have very often seen women’s cultural
            production as central to “consciousness raising”, and hence to social
            change.
              Despite the occasionally “separatist” ambitions of certain types of
            feminist politics, recent feminist cultural theory has been far from
            self-contained. K.K.Ruthven may indeed be “the Crocodile Dundee
            of male feminism”, as Elaine Showalter describes him, but he is right
            nonetheless to stress the extent to which feminist thought has been
            influenced by Marxism, structuralism and post-structuralism.  We
                                                                 12
            might add, moreover, as Ruthven does not, that much other feminist
            writing often remains covertly indebted to kinds of culturalism much
            more traditional to literary studies. To recognize as much is not to
            detract from the originality of the central feminist argument: that all
            hitherto existing societies, except perhaps the very early gynocentric
                                             13
            societies discussed by Merlin Stone,  have been patriarchally
            organized around the oppression of women by men; and that the
            dominant cultures of those societies have therefore been necessarily
            androcentric, that is, male-centred, and quite possibly positively
            misogynist. It is, however, to recognize the versatility and the
            eclecticism with which feminism has rifled through the patriarchal
            cultural legacy, in search of theories, methods and concepts that
            might be put to new, gynocentric, use. Hence the way in which
            feminist cultural theory has proved able to recycle concepts of
            ideology, of signification, and of culture.
              We should, then, alert ourselves to the influence of Marxism on
            socialist feminist writers, such as those associated with the British
            Marxist-feminist Literature Collective; and to that of structuralism
            and post-structuralism, and especially the work of Derrida and Lacan,
            on many of the writers associated with what was once the “new French
            feminism”. We should also, of course, note the often unacknowledged
            influence of culturalist notions of tradition and disinterestedness in


                                       111
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125