Page 14 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 14

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 5





                                      Cultural studies and cultural theory



                       The available definitions of the term ‘culture’ are many and
                     various then, and we shall have cause to consider them in more
                     detail in later chapters. But let us now offer our own working
                     ‘non-definition’ of ‘culture’ as referring to that entire range of
                     institutions, artefacts and practices that make up our symbolic
                     universe. In one or another of its meanings, the term will thus
                     embrace: art and religion, science and sport, education and
                     leisure. By convention, however, it does not embrace the range
                     of activities normally deemed either ‘economic’ or ‘political’. This
                     threefold distinction, between the economics of the market, the
                     politics of the state and the culture of what is sometimes referred
                     to as civil society, has been a recurrent motif in modern social
                     theory: it occurred, for example, in Karl Marx as the distinction
                     between mode of production, political superstructure and
                     social consciousness (Marx, 1975, p. 425) and in Max Weber
                     as that between class, party and status (Weber, 1948). But it is
                     clear that in each case, as in a whole range of parallel instances,
                     consciousness/status/culture (ideology/discourse etc.) are
                     largely residual categories, defined as much as anything by
                     their negative property of not being economics or politics.
                     As that which is neither work/class/exploitation nor war/
                     power/oppression, culture becomes ‘the heart of a heartless
                     world’, to borrow Marx’s description of religion (Marx, 1975,
                     p. 244). But just as religion in the abstract translates in practice
                     into religions in the bitterly contested plural, so too culture readily
                     translates into cultures. Hence its almost talismanic status
                     during the so-called ‘culture wars’ of late twentieth-century
                     United States, where it could denote simultaneously both the
                     canonical high ‘culture’ of established academic tradition and
                     the ethnic, sexual, generational and gendered ‘counter-cultures’
                     of the ‘new social movements’.



                     DEFINING CULTURAL STUDIES


                     The culture wars provide a suitable occasion to proceed from
                     culture to cultural studies, since part of what was at stake in
                     their still unresolved outcome is precisely the status of the new

                                                  5
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19